ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2021
Joint Design of RF and Gradient Waveforms via Auto-differentiation for 3D Tailored Excitation in MRI.
Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- SelExNet: A Self-Supervised Physics-Informed Framework for Multi-Channel Joint RF and Gradient Waveform Optimization in 2D Spatially Selective Excitation.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- The Ritz Adjoint Method for MRI Pulse Design.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2026Article
- Modeling the MRI gradient system with a temporal convolutional network: Improved reconstruction by prediction of readout gradient errors.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Multidimensional RF pulse design using auto-differentiable spin-domain optimization and its application to reduced field-of-view imaging.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Gpu-accelerated JEMRIS for extensive MRI simulations.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Article
- Artificial intelligence for neuro MRI acquisition: a review.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Review
- Unsupervised deep learning with convolutional neural networks for static parallel transmit design: A retrospective study.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- FastPtx: a versatile toolbox for rapid, joint design of pTx RF and gradient pulses using Pytorch's autodifferentiation.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Stochastic-offset-enhanced restricted slice excitation and 180° refocusing designs with spatially non-linear ΔBMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
- Selective excitation localized by the Bloch-Siegert shift and aMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Article
- Selective RF excitation designs enabled by time-varying spatially non-linear ΔBMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper proposes a new method for joint design of radiofrequency (RF) and gradient waveforms in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), and applies it to the design of 3D spatially tailored saturation and inversion pulses. The joint design of both waveforms is characterized by the ODE Bloch equations, to which there is no known direct solution. Existing approaches therefore typically rely on simplified problem formulations based on, e.g., the small-tip approximation or constraining the gradient waveforms to particular shapes, and often apply only to specific objective functions for a narrow set of design goals (e.g., ignoring hardware constraints). This paper develops and exploits an auto-differentiable Bloch simulator to directly compute Jacobians of the (Bloch-simulated) excitation pattern with respect to RF and gradient waveforms. This approach is compatible with arbitrary sub-differentiable loss functions, and optimizes the RF and gradients directly without restricting the waveform shapes. For computational efficiency, we derive and implement explicit Bloch simulator Jacobians (approximately halving computation time and memory usage). To enforce hardware limits (peak RF, gradient, and slew rate), we use a change of variables that makes the 3D pulse design problem effectively unconstrained; we then optimize the resulting problem directly using the proposed auto-differentiation framework. We demonstrate our approach with two kinds of 3D excitation pulses that cannot be easily designed with conventional approaches: Outer-volume saturation (90° flip angle), and inner-volume inversion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.