Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34029068›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2021

Multiomic Big Data Analysis Challenges: Increasing Confidence in the Interpretation of Artificial Intelligence Assessments.

Melanie T Odenkirk, David M Reif, Erin S Baker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Cancer chemoprevention: signaling pathways and strategic approaches.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Melanie T OdenkirkDepartment of Chemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27606, United States.
David M ReifDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27606, United States.
Erin S BakerDepartment of Chemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27606, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5246-2213

Funding

Single cell, multi-parametric high throughput platform to classify endocrine disruptor potential of mixturesP42ES027704 · NIEHS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI Weihsueh A Chiu · 2017 to 2026
$21.2M
Translational Research Support CoreP30ES025128 · NIEHS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI Sue Fenton · 2015 to 2026
$18.3M
Uncovering the Mechanisms of PFAS-induced ImmunotoxicityP42ES031009 · NIEHS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI HOPPIN, JANE · 2020 to 2024
$9.3M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES025128NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES027704NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES031009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The need for holistic molecular measurements to better understand disease initiation, development, diagnosis, and therapy has led to an increasing number of multiomic analyses. The wealth of information available from multiomic assessments, however, requires both the evaluation and interpretation of extremely large data sets, limiting analysis throughput and ease of adoption. Computational methods utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) provide the most promising way to address these challenges, yet despite the conceptual benefits of AI and its successful application in singular omic studies, the widespread use of AI in multiomic studies remains limited. Here, we discuss present and future capabilities of AI techniques in multiomic studies while introducing analytical checks and balances to validate the computational conclusions.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceData AnalysisBig Data

Identifiers

PMID34029068
PMCPMC8465926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.