Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34028761›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2021

Plastid Genomes of Flowering Plants: Essential Principles.

Tracey A Ruhlman, Robert K Jansen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
12.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Plastome evidence repositionsFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  6. Comparative chloroplast genomics of sixFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Rapid loss of plastidFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Plastid Genome Assembly Using Long-read data.Molecular ecology resources · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Characterization and Comparative Analysis of Chloroplast Genomes in FiveInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tracey A RuhlmanIntegrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA. truhlman@austin.utexas.edu.
Robert K JansenIntegrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
The University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The plastid genome (plastome ) has proved a valuable source of data for evaluating evolutionary relationships among angiosperms. Through basic and applied approaches, plastid transformation technology offers the potential to understand and improve plant productivity, providing food, fiber, energy, and medicines to meet the needs of a burgeoning global population. The growing genomic resources available to both phylogenetic and biotechnological investigations is allowing novel insights and expanding the scope of plastome research to encompass new species. In this chapter, we present an overview of some of the seminal and contemporary research that has contributed to our current understanding of plastome evolution and attempt to highlight the relationship between evolutionary mechanisms and the tools of plastid genetic engineering.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenes, PlantGenetic VariationGenome, PlastidGenetic EngineeringMagnoliopsidaPhylogenyPlastidsAngiospermDNA recombinationGenome evolutionInheritanceIntergenic regionInverted repeatPhylogenyPlastomeReplication and repair

Identifiers

PMID34028761
OpenAlexW3165250696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.