Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34028633›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2021

Development and Psychometric Validation of BREAST-Q Scales Measuring Cancer Worry, Fatigue, and Impact on Work.

Anne F Klassen, Manraj N Kaur, Elena Tsangaris, Claire E E de Vries, Louise Bordeleau, Toni Zhong, Stefan J Cano, Trisia Breitkopf, Andrea L Pusic

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. "Peace of Mind" After Mastectomy: A Scoping Review.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024
    Article
  5. Patient factors associated with cancer worry post-breast reconstruction: A cross-sectional study.Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Anne F KlassenMcMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. aklass@mcmaster.ca.
Manraj N KaurMcMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Elena TsangarisBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Claire E E de VriesBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Louise BordeleauJuravinski Cancer Center, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Toni ZhongToronto General Hospital, 8N-871, Norman Urquhart Wing, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Stefan J CanoCPsychol, AFBPsS, Modus Outcomes, Letchworth Garden City, UK.
Trisia BreitkopfMcMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Andrea L PusicBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USMcMaster University · CAJuravinski Cancer Centre · CAToronto General Hospital · CA

Funding

Canadian Cancer Society 319371
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe BREAST-Q is a patient-reported outcome measure for women with breast cancer. The aim of this study was to develop new BREAST-Q scales to measure Cancer Worry, Fatigue and Impact on Work.

methodsData were collected between January 2017 and November 2019. Phase 1 (qualitative) included participants from Canada and the USA, pre/post any type of breast cancer treatment (surgery, adjuvant, neoadjuvant). Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and coded line-by-line. New scales were drafted and refined through cognitive interviews and expert input. Phase 2 (field-test study) involved USA members of the Love Research Army (LRA). Rasch measurement theory analysis was used to examine reliability and validity.

resultsIn phase 1, 57 women were interviewed. Three concepts were identified as important to the breast cancer experience that are not currently covered in the BREAST-Q and developed into scales, i.e., Cancer Worry, Fatigue and Impact on Work. Feedback from nine women and 23 experts was used to establish content validity. The scales were field-tested in the LRA sample (n = 1680), of whom 1006 completed a test-retest. Reliability was > 0.81 for the person separation index, > 0.89 for Cronbach's alpha and > 0.83 for interclass correlation coefficients. Lower scores on all three scales were significantly associated with being closer in time to diagnosis and having a higher cancer stage at diagnosis (p < 0.001 on ANOVA).

conclusionThese new scales expand the BREAST-Q measurement system and provide a means to evaluate additional important outcomes for breast cancer patients in clinical care and research.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsQuality of LifeFatigueFemaleHumansPatient SatisfactionPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID34028633
OpenAlexW3165132150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.