ReviewEssays in biochemistry2021
Handheld bioprinting strategies for in situ wound dressing.
Review in Essays in biochemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Handheld Bioprinters in Skin Regeneration: Current Landscape, Clinical Promise, and the Road Ahead.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- The Promise of 3D Biomaterial Bioprinting for Wound-Healing and Skin Tissue Restoration.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- In situ UNIversal Orthogonal Network (UNION) bioink deposition for direct delivery of corneal stromal stem cells to corneal wounds.Bioactive materials · 2025Article
- Layer-by-layer assembly: advancing skin repair, one layer at a time.RSC advances · 2025Review
- An Adhesive Bioink toward Biofabrication under Wet Conditions.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2023Article
- A novel portableAPL bioengineering · 2023Article
- Review
- Bioinks adapted forRSC advances · 2023Review
- Microcarriers in application for cartilage tissue engineering: Recent progress and challenges.Bioactive materials · 2022Review
- A multifunctional micropore-forming bioink with enhanced anti-bacterial and anti-inflammatory properties.Biofabrication · 2022Article
- In Situ 3D Bioprinting Living Photosynthetic Scaffolds for Autotrophic Wound Healing.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Handheld bioprinting has recently attracted considerable attention as a technology to deliver biomaterials and/or cells to injury sites by using freeform, user-instructed deposition approaches, specifically targeted towards in situ wound dressing and healing. In this review, we present a concise introduction of handheld bioprinting, and a thorough discussion on design and manufacture of handheld bioprinters and choice over bioinks. Finally, the advantages, challenges, and prospective of the said technologies are elaborated. It is believed that handheld bioprinting will play an essential role in the field of in situ wound healing mainly due to its excellent portability, user-friendliness, cost-effectiveness, and amenability to various wound needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.