Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34028530›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2022

Comparative Population Genetics in the Human Gut Microbiome.

William R Shoemaker, Daisy Chen, Nandita R Garud

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Dynamics of dN/dS within recombining bacterial populations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Reversions mask the contribution of adaptive evolution in microbiomes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Detecting bacterial adaptation within individual microbiomes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  19. Emergent evolutionary forces in spatial models of luminal growth and their application to the human gut microbiota.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

William R ShoemakerDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0111-4838
Daisy ChenDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Nandita R GarudDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
University of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic variation in the human gut microbiome is responsible for conferring a number of crucial phenotypes like the ability to digest food and metabolize drugs. Yet, our understanding of how this variation arises and is maintained remains relatively poor. Thus, the microbiome remains a largely untapped resource, as the large number of coexisting species in the microbiome presents a unique opportunity to compare and contrast evolutionary processes across species to identify universal trends and deviations. Here we outline features of the human gut microbiome that, while not unique in isolation, as an assemblage make it a system with unparalleled potential for comparative population genomics studies. We consciously take a broad view of comparative population genetics, emphasizing how sampling a large number of species allows researchers to identify universal evolutionary dynamics in addition to new genes, which can then be leveraged to identify exceptional species that deviate from general patterns. To highlight the potential power of comparative population genetics in the microbiome, we reanalyze patterns of purifying selection across ∼40 prevalent species in the human gut microbiome to identify intriguing trends which highlight functional categories in the microbiome that may be under more or less constraint.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaBacteriaGenetics, PopulationHumansMetagenomicscomparative population geneticsmicrobial evolutionmicrobiomepopulation genetics

Identifiers

PMID34028530
PMCPMC8743038
OpenAlexW3135158332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.