Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34028255›Full record

ArticleACS chemical neuroscience2021

Comparing the Pfizer Central Nervous System Multiparameter Optimization Calculator and a BBB Machine Learning Model.

Fabio Urbina, Kimberley M Zorn, Daniela Brunner, Sean Ekins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS chemical neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. P2YACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Applications of artificial intelligence in drug discovery for neurological diseases.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. ACS chemical neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Biological Membrane-Penetrating Peptides: Computational Prediction and Applications.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fabio UrbinaDepartment of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7545, United States.
Kimberley M ZornCollaborations Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 840 Main Campus Drive, Lab 3510, Raleigh, North Carolina 27606, United States.
Daniela BrunnerPsychoGenics, 215 College Road, Paramus, New Jersey 07652, United States.
Sean EkinsCollaborations Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 840 Main Campus Drive, Lab 3510, Raleigh, North Carolina 27606, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5691-5790

Funding

Centralized assay datasets for modelling support of small drug discovery organizationsR44GM122196 · NIGMS · COLLABORATIONS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. · PI EKINS, SEAN · 2018 to 2022
$3.3M
UNC ImPACT Grant (Immersion Program to Advance Career Training)DP7OD020317 · OD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BRANDT, PATRICK DANIEL, BRENNWALD, PATRICK J · 2014 to 2018
$1.8M
MegaTox for analyzing and visualizing data across different screening systemsR43ES031038 · NIEHS · COLLABORATIONS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. · PI EKINS, SEAN · 2019 to 2020
$349k
MegaPredict for predicting natural product uses and their drug interactionsR43AT010585 · NCCIH · COLLABORATIONS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. · PI EKINS, SEAN · 2019 to 2020
$225k
NCCIH NIH HHS R43 AT010585NIEHS NIH HHS R43 ES031038NIGMS NIH HHS R44 GM122196NIH HHS DP7 OD020317
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to calculate whether small molecules will cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is an important task for companies working in neuroscience drug discovery. For a decade, scientists have relied on relatively simplistic rules such as Pfizer's central nervous system multiparameter optimization models (CNS-MPO) for guidance during the drug selection process. In parallel, there has been a continued development of more sophisticated machine learning models that utilize different molecular descriptors and algorithms; however, these models represent a "black box" and are generally less interpretable. In both cases, these methods predict the ability of small molecules to cross the BBB using the molecular structure information on its own without

Indexed as

Blood-Brain BarrierCentral Nervous SystemBayes TheoremCentral Nervous System AgentsMachine LearningCentral Nervous System AgentsBayesianblood−brain barriercentral nervous system multiparameter optimization models

Identifiers

PMID34028255
PMCPMC8260158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.