Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34028165›Full record

Observational studyBJU international2022

Predicting early outcomes in patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer using prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Dennie Meijer, Pim J van Leeuwen, Maarten L Donswijk, Thierry N Boellaard, Ivo G Schoots, Henk G van der Poel, Harry N Hendrikse, Daniela E Oprea-Lager, André N Vis

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BJU international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dennie MeijerDepartment of Urology, Prostate Cancer Network Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8298-575X
Pim J van LeeuwenDepartment of Urology, Prostate Cancer Network Amsterdam, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maarten L DonswijkDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Thierry N BoellaardDepartment of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ivo G SchootsDepartment of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Henk G van der PoelDepartment of Urology, Prostate Cancer Network Amsterdam, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8772-1120
Harry N HendrikseDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Daniela E Oprea-LagerDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
André N VisDepartment of Urology, Prostate Cancer Network Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo identify predictors of early oncological outcomes in patients who opt for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP) for localized prostate cancer (PCa), including conventional prognostic variables as well as multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET). PATIENTS AND

methodsThis observational study included 493 patients who underwent RARP and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) for unfavourable intermediate- or high-risk PCa. Outcome measurement was biochemical progression of disease, defined as any postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value ≥0.2 ng/mL, or the start of additional treatment. Cox regression analysis was performed to assess predictors for biochemical progression, including initial PSA value, biopsy Grade Group (GG), T-stage on mpMRI, and lymph node status on PSMA PET imaging (miN0 vs miN1).

resultsThe median (interquartile range) total follow-up of all included patients without biochemical progression was 12.6 (7.5-22.7) months. When assessing biochemical progression after surgery, initial PSA value (per doubling; odds ratio [OR] 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.40; P = 0.004), biopsy GG ≥4 vs GG 1-2 (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.18-2.85; P = 0.007), T-stage on mpMRI (rT3a vs rT2: OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.39-3.27; P = 0.001; ≥rT3b vs rT2: OR 4.78, 95% CI 3.20-7.16; P < 0.001) and miN1 on PSMA PET imaging (OR 2.94, 95% CI 2.02-4.27; P < 0.001) were independent predictors of early biochemical progression of disease.

conclusionInitial PSA value, biopsy GG ≥4, ≥rT3 disease on mpMRI and miN1 disease on PSMA PET were predictors of early biochemical progression after RARP. Identifying these patients with an increased risk of early biochemical progression after surgery may have major implications for patient counselling in radical treatment decisions and on patient selection for modern (neo-)adjuvant and systematic treatments.

Indexed as

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingAgedAntigens, SurfaceBiopsyDisease ProgressionGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IIHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingPelvisPositron-Emission TomographyAntigens, SurfaceFOLH1 protein, humanGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IIProstate-Specific Antigenbiochemical progressionmultiparametric MRIoncological outcome#PCSMprostate cancer#ProstateCancerPSMA PET imaging

Identifiers

PMID34028165
PMCPMC9290881
OpenAlexW3164872337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.