Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34028069›Full record

ReviewMedicinal research reviews2022

The antigen-binding moiety in the driver's seat of CARs.

Heleen Hanssens, Fien Meeus, Kim De Veirman, Karine Breckpot, Nick Devoogdt

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicinal research reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Modular (universal) CAR-T platformsFrontiers in immunology · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Imaging the fate of CAR-T cellsFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Structure-guided engineering of CD112 receptor variants for optimized immunotherapy.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Article
  14. Targets for CAR Therapy in Multiple Myeloma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Heleen HanssensIn Vivo Cellular and Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8996-4671
Fien MeeusIn Vivo Cellular and Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5866-2002
Kim De VeirmanLaboratory of Hematology and Immunology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1313-6121
Karine BreckpotLaboratory for Molecular and Cellular Therapy, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4331-3480
Nick DevoogdtIn Vivo Cellular and Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9220-4833

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immuno-oncology has been at the forefront of cancer treatment in recent decades. In particular immune checkpoint and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy have achieved spectacular results. Over the years, CAR-T cell development has followed a steady evolutionary path, focusing on increasing T cell potency and sustainability, which has given rise to different CAR generations. However, there was less focus on the mode of interaction between the CAR-T cell and the cancer cell; more specifically on the targeting moiety used in the CAR and its specific properties. Recently, the importance of optimizing this domain has been recognized and the possibilities have been exploited. Over the last 10 years-in addition to the classical scFv-based CARs-single domain CARs, natural receptor-ligand CARs, universal CARs and CARs targeting more than one antigen have emerged. In addition, the specific parameters of the targeting domain and their influence on T cell activation are being examined. In this review, we concisely present the history of CAR-T cell therapy, and then expand on various developments in the CAR ectodomain. We discuss different formats, each with their own advantages and disadvantages, as well as the developments in affinity tuning, avidity effects, epitope location, and influence of the extracellular spacer.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveNeoplasmsHumansT-Lymphocytesadoptive T cell therapycancerchimeric antigen receptorimmunotherapyT cell receptortumor-infiltrating lymphocyte

Identifiers

PMID34028069
PMCPMC9292017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.