Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34027909›Full record

ArticleFemale pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery2021

Genome-Wide Association Study of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Using the Michigan Genomics Initiative.

Caroline K Cox, Anita Pandit, Matthew Zawistowski, Diptavo Dutta, Goutham Narla, Carolyn W Swenson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Chapter 4.5: New Proposed Treatments for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.International urogynecology journal · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Caroline K Cox
Anita PanditDepartment of Biostatistics.
Matthew ZawistowskiDepartment of Biostatistics.
Diptavo DuttaSchool of Public Health.
Goutham NarlaDivision of Genetic Medicine.
Carolyn W SwensonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

University of Michigan WRHR Career Development ProgramK12HD065257 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI FENNER, DEE ELLEN · 2010 to 2019
$3.4M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD065257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to (1) replicate previously identified genetic variants significantly associated with pelvic organ prolapse and (2) identify new genetic variants associated with pelvic organ prolapse using a genome-wide association study.

methodsUsing our institution's database linking genetic and clinical data, we identified 1,329 women of European ancestry with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9)/ICD-10 code for prolapse, 767 of whom also had Current Procedural Terminology (CPT)/ICD-9/ICD-10 procedure codes for prolapse surgery, and 16,383 women of European ancestry older than 40 years without a prolapse diagnosis code as controls. Patients were genotyped using the Illumina HumanCoreExome chip and imputed to the Haplotype Reference Consortium. We tested 20 million single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for association with pelvic organ prolapse adjusting for relatedness, age, chip version, and 4 principal components. We compared our results with 18 previously identified genome-wide significant SNPs from the UK Biobank, Commun Biol (2020;3:129), and Obstet Gynecol (2011;118:1345-1353).

resultsNo variants achieved genome-wide significance (P = 5 × 10-8). However, we replicated 4 SNPs with biologic plausibility at nominal significance (P ≤ 0.05): rs12325192 (P = 0.002), rs9306894 (P = 0.05), rs1920568 (P = 0.034), and rs1247943 (P = 0.041), which were all intergenic and nearest the genes SALL1, GDF7, TBX5, and TBX5, respectively.

conclusionsOur replication of 4 biologically plausible previously reported SNPs provides further evidence for a genetic contribution to prolapse, specifically that rs12325192, rs9306894, rs1920568, and rs1247943 may contribute to susceptibility for prolapse. These and previously reported associations that have not yet been replicated should be further explored in larger, more diverse cohorts, perhaps through meta-analysis.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseAdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMichiganMiddle AgedPelvic Organ ProlapsePolymorphism, Single NucleotideWhite People

Identifiers

PMID34027909
PMCPMC9169556
OpenAlexW3165814746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.