Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34027605›Full record

SynthesisJournal of general internal medicine2022

Association of Health Insurance Literacy with Health Care Utilization: a Systematic Review.

Brian F Yagi, Jamie E Luster, Aaron M Scherer, Madeline R Farron, Judith E Smith, Renuka Tipirneni

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of general internal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trends, Disparities, and Outcomes in Time to Treatment Initiation in Patients With Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Brian F YagiDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Jamie E LusterDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of General Medicine, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Road, Bldg 16, Rm 419W, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Aaron M SchererDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Madeline R FarronDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of General Medicine, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Road, Bldg 16, Rm 419W, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Judith E SmithTaubman Health Sciences Library, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Renuka TipirneniDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of General Medicine, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Road, Bldg 16, Rm 419W, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. rtipirne@med.umich.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0610-9707

Funding

Improving the Health of Low-SES Americans Approaching Retirement Under the Affordable Care ActK08AG056591 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI TIPIRNENI, RENUKA · 2017 to 2021
$836k
NIA NIH HHS K08 AG056591NIH HHS K08AG056591
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven increasing numbers of people experiencing transitions in health insurance due to declines in employer-sponsored insurance and changes in health policy, the understanding and application of health insurance terms and concepts (health insurance literacy) may be important for navigating use of health care. The study objective was to systematically review evidence on the relationship between health insurance literacy and health care utilization.

methodsMedline, SCOPUS, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsychInfo, Cochrane Library, and reference lists of published literature were searched in August 2019. Quantitative, qualitative, and intervention studies that assessed the association of health insurance literacy as the exposure and health care utilization as the outcome were identified, without language or date restrictions. Outcomes were independently assessed by 2-3 reviewers.

resultsTwenty-one studies including a total of 62,416 subjects met inclusion criteria: three interventional trials, two mixed-methods studies, and sixteen cross-sectional studies. Ten of thirteen preventive care studies suggested that higher health insurance literacy was associated with greater utilization of primary care and other preventive services. Eight of nine studies of care avoidance demonstrated that individuals with lower health insurance literacy were more likely to delay or avoid care. A few studies had mixed results regarding the utilization of emergency department, inpatient, and surgical care. DISCUSSION: The emerging literature in this area suggests that health insurance literacy is an important factor that can enable effective utilization of health care, including primary care and preventive services. However, the literature is limited by a paucity of studies using validated tools that broadly measure health insurance literacy (rather than testing knowledge of specific covered services). Improving health insurance literacy of the general public and increasing plain language communication of health insurance plan features at the point of health care navigation may encourage more effective and cost-conscious utilization.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyInsurance, HealthCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CarePreventive Health Servicesdelay or avoidance of carehealth care utilizationhealth insurance literacymedication adherence

Identifiers

PMID34027605
PMCPMC8141365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.