Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34027579›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2022

COVID-19's Impact on Cancer Care: Increased Emotional Stress in Patients and High Risk of Provider Burnout.

Omid Salehi, Sylvia V Alarcon, Eduardo A Vega, Onur C Kutlu, Olga Kozyreva, Jennifer A Chan, Vera Kazakova, Dominique Harz, Claudius Conrad

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Otolaryngology in the face of A pandemic.Operative techniques in otolaryngology--head and neck surgery · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Omid SalehiDepartment of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, 11 Nevins St., Suite 201, Brighton, MA, 02135, USA.
Sylvia V AlarconDepartment of Medical Oncology & Hematology, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center and Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Eduardo A VegaDepartment of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, 11 Nevins St., Suite 201, Brighton, MA, 02135, USA.
Onur C KutluDepartment of Surgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Olga KozyrevaDepartment of Medical Oncology & Hematology, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center and Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Jennifer A ChanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Vera KazakovaDepartment of Internal Medicine, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Dominique HarzMMSc Medical Education Program, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
Claudius ConradDepartment of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, 11 Nevins St., Suite 201, Brighton, MA, 02135, USA. claudius.conrad@steward.org.ORCID 0000-0001-9912-4545
Tufts University · USSt. Elizabeth's Medical Center · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USHarvard University · USUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19's precise impact on cancer patients and their oncologic care providers remains poorly understood. This study aims at comparatively analyzing COVID-19's effect on cancer care from both patient and provider perspectives.

methodsA multi-institutional survey was developed to assess COVID-19-specific concerns regarding treatment, safety, and emotional stress through 5-point Likert-type prompts and open-ended questions before and during the pandemic. Wilcoxon signed-rank and rank-sum tests were used to analyze before/during answers for providers and patients independently. Open-ended responses were assessed using inductive thematic analysis.

resultsThe survey was completed by 104 (69.3%) patients and 50 (50%) providers. Patients demonstrated a significant change in only 1 of 15 Likert prompts. Most significant were increased concern regarding susceptibility to infection [z = 2.536, p = 0.011] and concerns regarding their cancer outcome [z = 4.572, p < 0.001]. Non-physician providers demonstrated significant change in 8 of 13 Likert prompts, whereas physicians had all 13 Likert prompts change in the COVID-19 setting. Physicians believed care to be more poorly planned [z = -3.857, p ≤ 0.001], availability of protective personal equipment to be more limited [z = -4.082, p < 0.001], and were significantly concerned infecting family members [z = 4.965, p < 0.001].

conclusionsWhile patients had more difficulty coping with their cancer, they did not perceive significant differences in their actual treatment. This suggests the need for a renewed focus on patients coping with cancer. Among providers, physicians more than any other provider group had a strong negative perception of COVID-19's impact on healthcare, suggesting the need for novel approaches to target physician burnout.

Indexed as

COVID-19NeoplasmsPsychological DistressBurnout, PsychologicalHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesCancer careCOVID-19Professional burnoutPsychological stressSurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID34027579
PMCPMC8141360
OpenAlexW3163974984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.