ReviewArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2021
Both Debridement and Microfracture Produce Excellent Results for Osteochondritis Dissecans Lesions of the Capitellum: A Systematic Review.
Review in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Revision rate after surgery for elbow osteochondritis dissecans: a systemic review.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Pooled it
- Autologous chondrocyte implantation in osteochondral defects of the capitulum: clinical and radiological outcome in a case series.JSES international · 2026Article
- Arthroscopic treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the capitellum in an early adolescent swimmer: a case report.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Article
- Management of osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the elbow including return to sport remains variable among orthopaedic surgeons.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Article
- Pediatric Patients Who Underwent Elbow Arthroscopy Had an 86% Return-to-Sport Rate, a 12% Reoperation Rate, and a 3.7% Complication Rate.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Elbow in Overhead Athletes: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Osteochondritis dissecans of the temporomandibular joint: a scoping review.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2024Article
- Accessibility of osteochondral lesion at the capitellum during elbow arthroscopy: an anatomical study.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Article
- Update in diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of osteochondritis dissecans of the capitellum.Shoulder & elbow · 2024Review
- Extra-articular core tunneling and local autogenous bone grafting for osteochondritis dissecans lesion of the capitellum with intact articular cartilage and subchondral bone deficiency.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2024Article
- Early Arthroscopic Debridement May Be More Cost-Effective Than Nonoperative Management for Symptomatic Osteochondritis Dissecans Lesions of the Capitellum.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2024Article
- Long-term outcomes after arthroscopic treatment of dogs affected by osteochondrosis dissecans of the humeral trochlea, with or without medial coronoid disease: 23 cases (2012-2020).Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire · 2023Article
- Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Capitellum of the Elbow: Improved Outcomes in Surgically Treated Versus Nonoperatively Treated Patients at Long-Term Follow-up.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo analyze the available literature pertaining to the indications, outcomes, and complications of both microfracture (MFX) and simple debridement for capitellar osteochondritis dissecans (OCD).
methodsA comprehensive literature review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) criteria. Studies were included if they evaluated OCD of the capitellum that underwent either arthroscopic debridement (AD) or MFX. The risk of bias was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) scale. Patient demographic characteristics, imaging findings, return-to-sport rates, patient-reported outcomes, range of motion (ROM), complications, failures, and reoperations were recorded.
resultsEleven studies with 327 patients (332 elbows) met the inclusion criteria. Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) scores ranged from 63% to 75% and showed considerable heterogeneity. Both AD and MFX showed improvement in patient outcome scores, ROM, and return to play, although the data precluded relative conclusions. Improvement in motion after MFX ranged from 4.9° to 5° of flexion, 5° to 22.6° of extension, 1° to 2° of pronation, and 0.5° to 2° of supination, whereas after AD, it ranged from -4° to 6° of flexion and -0.4° to 14° of extension, with prono-supination noted in only 1 study. The rate of return to play at a similar level of preinjury athletic competition ranged from 55% to 75% after MFX and from 40% to 100% after AD. Lesion location was discussed in only 1 study. Postoperative imaging trended toward early degenerative changes, most commonly of the radial head. Complications were only reported in 1 MFX study; in all cases, the complication was transient ulnar nerve neurapraxia. Reoperation rates ranged from 0% to 10%, and reoperation was most commonly performed to address radial head enlargement. Five studies reported no reoperations.
conclusionsBoth AD and MFX for capitellar OCD appear to yield excellent improvements in pain, ROM, patient outcome scores, and return to sport. Given that comparable mid-term outcomes can be achieved with debridement alone, without the use of MFX, similarly to recent prospective studies in the knee, AD alone may be a reasonable approach to relatively small OCD defects. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of studies, all Level IV evidence.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.