Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34027441›Full record

ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2021

Biceps Box Configuration for Superior Capsule Reconstruction of the Glenohumeral Joint Decreases Superior Translation but Not to Native Levels in a Biomechanical Study.

Patrick J Denard, Seungbum Chae, Christen Chalmers, Jae Hyuk Choi, Michelle H McGarry, Gregory Adamson, Max Park, Thay Q Lee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Patrick J DenardOregon Shoulder Institute, Medford, Oregon, U.S.A.
Seungbum ChaeOrthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Congress Medical Foundation, Pasadena, California, U.S.A.
Christen ChalmersOrthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Congress Medical Foundation, Pasadena, California, U.S.A.
Jae Hyuk ChoiOrthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Congress Medical Foundation, Pasadena, California, U.S.A.
Michelle H McGarryOrthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Congress Medical Foundation, Pasadena, California, U.S.A.
Gregory AdamsonOrthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Congress Medical Foundation, Pasadena, California, U.S.A.
Max ParkSouthern California Permanente Group, Woodland Hills, California, U.S.A.
Thay Q LeeOrthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Congress Medical Foundation, Pasadena, California, U.S.A.
Orthopaedic Research Foundation · USDaegu Catholic University · KROregon Research Institute · USWoodland Hills Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo quantitatively biomechanically assess superior stability, subacromial contact pressures, and glenohumeral kinematics of an in situ biceps tenodesis and a box-shaped long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) in a superior massive rotator cuff tear (MCT) model.

methodsEight cadaveric shoulders (mean age, 62 years; range, 46-70 years) were tested with a custom testing system used to evaluate range of motion, superior translation, and subacromial contact pressure at 0°, 20°, and 40° of abduction. Conditions tested included native state, MCT (complete supraspinatus and one-half of the infraspinatus), a box-shaped LHBT SCR, and an in situ biceps tenodesis. The box-shaped SCR was performed by maintaining the biceps origin, securing 2 corners to the greater tuberosity, and one corner to the posterior glenoid. The in situ tenodesis was performed anatomically at the top of the articular margin in the same shoulder after take-down of the box SCR.

resultsRange of motion was not impaired with either repair construct (

conclusionsA box-shaped SCR using the native biceps tendon partially restores increased superior translation and peak subacromial contact pressure due to MCT. The technique may have a role in augmentation of an irreparable MCT. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The box-shaped LHBT SCR technique may have a role in augmentation of an irreparable MCT.

Identifiers

PMID34027441
PMCPMC8129057
OpenAlexW3128303230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.