Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34027349›Full record

ArticleCJC open2021

Referral Practices of Cardiologists to Specialist Palliative Care in Canada.

Michael J Bonares, Ken Mah, Jane MacIver, Lindsay Hurlburt, Ebru Kaya, Gary Rodin, Heather Ross, Camilla Zimmermann, Kirsten Wentlandt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CJC open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Quality of referrals to specialist palliative care and remote patient triage - a cross-sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Michael J BonaresDivision of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ken MahDepartment of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jane MacIverPeter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lindsay HurlburtDepartment of Supportive Care, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ebru KayaDivision of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Gary RodinDepartment of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Heather RossPeter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Camilla ZimmermannDivision of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kirsten WentlandtDepartment of Supportive Care, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with heart failure have palliative care needs that can be effectively addressed by specialist palliative care (SPC). Despite this, SPC utilization by this patient population is low, suggesting barriers to SPC referral. We sought to determine the referral practices of cardiologists to SPC.

methodsCardiologists across Canada were invited to participate in a survey about their referral practices to SPC. Associations between referral practices and demographic, professional, and attitudinal factors were analyzed using multiple and logistic regression.

resultsThe response rate was 51% (551 of 1082). Between 35.1% and 64.2% of respondents were unaware of referral criteria to local SPC services. Of the respondents, 29% delayed SPC referral because of prognostic uncertainty, and 46.8% believed that SPC prioritizes patients with cancer. In actual practice, nearly three-fourths of cardiologists referred late. Referral frequency was associated with greater availability of SPC services for patients with nonmalignant diseases (

conclusionsThe findings suggest that barriers to timely SPC referral include an insufficiency of services for patients with nonmalignant diseases especially in the outpatient setting, the perception that SPC services do not accept patients receiving cardiology-specific treatments, and a misperception about the identity of palliative care.

Identifiers

PMID34027349
PMCPMC8129434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.