ArticleHeliyon2021
Application of Artificial Intelligence powered digital writing assistant in higher education: randomized controlled trial.
Article in Heliyon, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Impact of AI on Learners' Self-Efficacy: A Meta-Analysis.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Techniques for supercharging academic writing with generative AI.Nature biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Advancing Medical Research Through Artificial Intelligence: Progressive and Transformative Strategies: A Literature Review.Health science reports · 2025Article
- The Active Learning-GenAI Synergy Framework: Ethical Integration of Generative AI in EFL/ESL Writing in Resource-Constrained Contexts.F1000Research · 2025Article
- ChatGPT applications in academic writing: a review of potential, limitations, and ethical challenges.Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia · 2025Article
- The impact of using ChatGPT on academic writing among medical undergraduates.Annals of medicine · 2024Article
- From literacy to learning: The sequential mediation of attitudes and enjoyment in AI-assisted EFL education.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Evaluation of ChatGPT's Real-Life Implementation in Undergraduate Dental Education: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR medical education · 2024Article
- Mediating effects of artificial intelligence on the relationship between academic engagement and mental health among Chinese college students.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Article
- Free software applications for authors for writing a research paper.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2023Review
- Article
- Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation: assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted language learning for EFL students.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Teachers' AI digital competencies and twenty-first century skills in the post-pandemic world.Educational technology research and development : ETR & D · 2023Article
- Do sentiments of professors feedback change after migrating from in-person to online modalities? Pre- and during COVID-19 experience.Universal access in the information society · 2022Article
- Interactive Design Psychology and Artificial Intelligence-Based Innovative Exploration of Anglo-American Traumatic Narrative Literature.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Using ChatGPT for Writing Articles for Patients' Education for Dermatological Diseases: A Pilot Study.Indian dermatology online journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A major challenge in educational technology integration is to engage students with different affective characteristics. Also, how technology shapes attitude and learning behavior is still lacking. Findings from educational psychology and learning sciences have gained less traction in research. The present study was conducted to examine the efficacy of a group format of an Artificial Intelligence (AI) powered writing tool for English second postgraduate students in the English academic writing context. In the present study, (N = 120) students were randomly allocated to either the equipped AI (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.