Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34026974›Full record

ArticleData in brief2021

Responses of hydroponically grown maize to various urea to ammonium ratios: physiological and molecular data.

Sara Buoso, Nicola Tomasi, Daniel Said-Pullicino, Mustapha Arkoun, Jean-Claude Yvin, Roberto Pinton, Laura Zanin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Single-cell insights into plant growth, adaptation, and evolution.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Facilitating Growth of Maize (Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sara BuosoDepartment of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Sciences, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Nicola TomasiDepartment of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Sciences, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Daniel Said-PullicinoDepartment of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Torino, Grugliasco, Italy.
Mustapha ArkounLaboratoire de Nutrition Végétale, Centre Mondial de l'Innovation, Groupe Roullier, Saint-Malo, France.
Jean-Claude YvinLaboratoire de Nutrition Végétale, Centre Mondial de l'Innovation, Groupe Roullier, Saint-Malo, France.
Roberto PintonDepartment of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Sciences, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Laura ZaninDepartment of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Sciences, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
University of Udine · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To date urea and ammonium are two nitrogen (N) forms widely used in agriculture. Due to a low production cost, urea is the N form most applied in agriculture. However, its stability in the soil depends on the activity of microbial ureases, that operate the hydrolysis of urea into ammonium. In the soil ammonium is subjected to fast volatilization in form of ammonia, an environmental N loss that contributes to the atmospheric pollution and impacts on farm economies. Based on these considerations, the optimization of N fertilization is useful in order to maximize N acquired by crops and at the same time limit N losses in the environment. The use of mixed nitrogen forms in cultivated soils allows to have urea and ammonium simultaneously available for the root acquisition after a fertilization event. A combination of different N-sources is known to lead to positive effects on the nutritional status of crops. It is plausible suppose that N acquisition mechanisms in plants might be responsive to N forms available in the root external solution, and therefore indicate a cross connection among different N forms, such as urea and ammonium. This DIB article provides details about the elemental composition and transcriptional changes occurring in maize seedlings when ammonium and urea mixture is applied to nutrient solution. An extensive and complete characterization of seedling response to urea and ammonium treatments is shown in the research article "Characterization of physiological and molecular responses of

Indexed as

Gene expressionIonomicMixture of N sourcesN fertilizersNitrogen transportersRoot uptake

Identifiers

PMID34026974
PMCPMC8120942
OpenAlexW3158897076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.