Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34026707›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in public health2021

Implications of Zoonoses From Hunting and Use of Wildlife in North American Arctic and Boreal Biomes: Pandemic Potential, Monitoring, and Mitigation.

Lucy O Keatts, Martin Robards, Sarah H Olson, Karsten Hueffer, Stephen J Insley, Damien O Joly, Susan Kutz, David S Lee, Cheryl-Lesley B Chetkiewicz, Stéphane Lair and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Lucy O KeattsWildlife Conservation Society Health Program, Bronx, NY, United States.
Martin RobardsWildlife Conservation Society, Arctic Beringia Program, Fairbanks, AK, United States.
Sarah H OlsonWildlife Conservation Society Health Program, Bronx, NY, United States.
Karsten HuefferDepartment of Veterinary Medicine & Arctic and Northern Studies Program, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, United States.
Stephen J InsleyWildlife Conservation Society Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Damien O JolyNyati Health Consulting, Nanaimo, BC, Canada.
Susan KutzDepartment of Ecosystem and Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
David S LeeDepartment of Wildlife and Environment, Nunavut Tunngavik Inc., Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Cheryl-Lesley B ChetkiewiczWildlife Conservation Society Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Stéphane LairCanadian Wildlife Health Cooperative, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Nicholas D PrestonSalmon Coast Field Station, Echo Bay, BC, Canada.
Mathieu PruvotWildlife Conservation Society Health Program, Bronx, NY, United States.
Justina C RayWildlife Conservation Society Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Donald ReidWildlife Conservation Society Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jonathan M SleemanUnited States Geological Survey National Wildlife Health Center, Madison, WI, United States.
Raphaela StimmelmayrNorth Slope Department of Wildlife Management, Utqiagvik, AK, United States.
Craig StephenUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Chris WalzerWildlife Conservation Society Health Program, Bronx, NY, United States.
Wildlife Conservation Society Canada · CAWildlife Conservation Society · USUniversity of Alaska Fairbanks · USUniversity of Calgary · CARoss University School of Veterinary Medicine · KNUnited States Geological Survey · USUniversité de Montréal · CAUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has re-focused attention on mechanisms that lead to zoonotic disease spillover and spread. Commercial wildlife trade, and associated markets, are recognized mechanisms for zoonotic disease emergence, resulting in a growing global conversation around reducing human disease risks from spillover associated with hunting, trade, and consumption of wild animals. These discussions are especially relevant to people who rely on harvesting wildlife to meet nutritional, and cultural needs, including those in Arctic and boreal regions. Global policies around wildlife use and trade can impact food sovereignty and security, especially of Indigenous Peoples. We reviewed known zoonotic pathogens and current risks of transmission from wildlife (including fish) to humans in North American Arctic and boreal biomes, and evaluated the epidemic and pandemic potential of these zoonoses. We discuss future concerns, and consider monitoring and mitigation measures in these changing socio-ecological systems. While multiple zoonotic pathogens circulate in these systems, risks to humans are mostly limited to individual illness or local community outbreaks. These regions are relatively remote, subject to very cold temperatures, have relatively low wildlife, domestic animal, and pathogen diversity, and in many cases low density, including of humans. Hence, favorable conditions for emergence of novel diseases or major amplification of a spillover event are currently not present. The greatest risk to northern communities from pathogens of pandemic potential is via introduction with humans visiting from other areas. However, Arctic and boreal ecosystems are undergoing rapid changes through climate warming, habitat encroachment, and development; all of which can change host and pathogen relationships, thereby affecting the probability of the emergence of new (and re-emergence of old) zoonoses. Indigenous leadership and engagement in disease monitoring, prevention and response, is vital from the outset, and would increase the success of such efforts, as well as ensure the protection of Indigenous rights as outlined in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Partnering with northern communities and including Indigenous Knowledge Systems would improve the timeliness, and likelihood, of detecting emerging zoonotic risks, and contextualize risk assessments to the unique human-wildlife relationships present in northern biomes.

Indexed as

Animals, WildCOVID-19AnimalsArctic RegionsEcosystemHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2United StatesZoonosesArcticborealhuntingIndigenousOne Healthpandemicwildlifezoonotic

Identifiers

PMID34026707
PMCPMC8131663
OpenAlexW3157756078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.