ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2021
Sagittal Jaw Relationship of Different Types of Cleft and Non-cleft Individuals.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Children with Cleft Lip and Palate-A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- FDA-Approved AI Solutions in Dental Imaging: A Narrative Review of Applications, Evidence, and Outlook.International dental journal · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence applications in the diagnosis and management of cleft lip and palate: An updated review.Journal of dental sciences · 2026Review
- Applications of artificial intelligence in diagnosis and treatment planning of orthodontics: a narrative review.The Saudi dental journal · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in Pediatric Craniofacial Surgery.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Effectiveness of Early Intervention with Palatal Expansion Versus Late Orthodontic Treatment for Correcting Maxillary Crowding.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2024Article
- Review
- Development of Artificial Neural Network-Based Prediction Model for Evaluation of Maxillary Arch Growth in Children with Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Effects of Alt-RAMEC protocol with facemask therapy in cleft lip palate patients in a sample of Pakistani population.BMC oral health · 2023Article
- Assessment of anterior open bite prevalence in children visiting a dental hospital - A retrospective evaluation.Journal of advanced pharmaceutical technology & research · 2022Article
- Association of crossbite with vertical skeletal growth patterns: A retrospective study.Journal of advanced pharmaceutical technology & research · 2022Article
- Severity of mandibular arch crowding in different sagittal malocclusions.Journal of advanced pharmaceutical technology & research · 2022Article
- Association of vertical growth pattern with canine impactions in Dravidian subjects.Journal of advanced pharmaceutical technology & research · 2022Article
- Association of severity of malocclusion with socioeconomic status in the South Indian population.Journal of advanced pharmaceutical technology & research · 2022Article
- Cephalometric Analysis in Orthodontics Using Artificial Intelligence-A Comprehensive Review.BioMed research international · 2022Review
- The Assessment of 3D Digital Models Using GOSLON Yardstick Index: Exploring Confounding Factors Responsible for Unfavourable Treatment Outcome in Multi-Population Children With UCLP.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate whether the craniofacial sagittal jaw relationship in patients with non-syndromic cleft differed from non-cleft (NC) individuals by artificial intelligence (A.I.)-driven lateral cephalometric (Late. Ceph.) analysis. The study group comprised 123 subjects with different types of clefts including 29 = BCLP (bilateral cleft lip and palate), 41 = UCLP (unilateral cleft lip and palate), 9 = UCLA (unilateral cleft lip and alveolus), 13 = UCL (unilateral cleft lip) and NC = 31. The mean age was 14.77 years. SNA, SNB, ANB angle and Wits appraisal was measured in lateral cephalogram using a new innovative A.I driven Webceph software. Two-way ANOVA and multiple-comparison statistics tests were applied to see the differences between gender and among different types of clefts vs. NC individuals. A significant decrease (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.