Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34026686›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2021

Current Status of Newborn Screening in Southeastern Europe.

Vanesa Koracin, Matej Mlinaric, Ivo Baric, Ian Brincat, Maja Djordjevic, Ana Drole Torkar, Ksenija Fumic, Mirjana Kocova, Tatjana Milenkovic, Florentina Moldovanu and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Current Status of Newborn Screening in Southeastern and Central Europe.International journal of neonatal screening · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. International Survey on Phenylketonuria Newborn Screening.International journal of neonatal screening · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Perception of genomic newborn screening among peripartum mothers.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Vanesa KoracinGeneral Hospital Novo mesto, Novo mesto, Slovenia.
Matej MlinaricUniversity Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Ivo BaricDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University Hospital Center Zagreb and University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Ian BrincatMater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta.
Maja DjordjevicDepartment of Metabolism and Clinical Genetics, Institute for Mother and Child Health Care of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Ana Drole TorkarUniversity Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Ksenija FumicDepartment of Laboratory Diagnostics, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Mirjana KocovaDepartment of Endocrinology and Genetics, University Pediatric Clinic, Skopje, Macedonia.
Tatjana MilenkovicDepartment of Pediatric Endocrinology, Institute for Mother and Child Health Care of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Florentina MoldovanuDepartment of Pediatrics, National Institute for Mother and Child Health, Alessandrescu-Rusescu, Bucharest, Romania.
Vjosa Mulliqi KotoriPediatric Clinic, University Clinical Center, Pristina, Kosovo.
Michaela Iuliana NanuDepartment of Pediatrics, National Institute for Mother and Child Health, Alessandrescu-Rusescu, Bucharest, Romania.
Ziga Iztok RemecClinical Institute for Special Laboratory Diagnostics, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Barbka Repic LampretFaculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Dimitrios PlatisDepartment of Neonatal Screening, Institute of Child Health, Athens, Greece.
Alexey SavovNational Genetic Laboratory, University Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Mira SamardzicInstitute for Sick Children, Clinical Center of Montenegro, Podgorica, Montenegro.
Biljana SuzicChildren Hospital Banja Luka, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Ildiko SzatmariChildren's Clinic, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Alma ToromanovicDepartment of Pediatrics, University Clinical Center, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Mojca Zerjav TansekUniversity Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Tadej BattelinoUniversity Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Urh GroseljUniversity Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significant part of Southeastern Europe (with a population of 76 million) has newborn screening (NBS) programs non-harmonized with developed European countries. Initial survey was conducted in 2013/2014 among 11 countries from the region (Albania, Bulgaria, Bosnia and Herzegovina (BIH), Croatia, Kosovo, Macedonia, Moldova, Montenegro, Romania, Serbia, and Slovenia) to assess the main characteristics of their NBS programs and their future plans. Their cumulative population at that time was ~52,5 million. At that time, none of the countries had an expanded NBS program, while phenylketonuria screening was not introduced in four and congenital hypothyroidism in three of 11 countries. We repeated the survey in 2020 inviting the same 11 countries, adding Cyprus, Greece, Hungary, and Malta (due to their geographical position in the wider region). The aims were to assess the current state, to evaluate the change in the period, and to identify the main obstacles impacting the implementation of expanded NBS and/or reaching a wider population. Responses were collected from 12 countries (BIH-Federation of BIH, BIH-Republic of Srpska, Bulgaria, Croatia, Greece, Hungary, Kosovo, North Macedonia, Malta, Montenegro, Romania, Serbia, Slovenia) with a population of 68.5 million. The results of the survey showed that the regional situation regarding NBS only modestly improved in this period. All of the surveyed countries except Kosovo screened for at least congenital hypothyroidism, while phenylketonuria was not screened in four of 12 countries. Croatia and Slovenia implemented an expanded NBS program using tandem mass spectrometry from the time of last survey. In conclusion, the current status of NBS programs in Southeastern Europe is very variable and is still underdeveloped (or even non-existent) in some of the countries. We suggest establishing an international task-force to assist with implementation and harmonization of basic NBS services where needed.

Indexed as

dried blood sampleexpanded NBS programNBSneonatal screeningnewborn screeningsoutheastern Europesurvey

Identifiers

PMID34026686
PMCPMC8138576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.