Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34026644›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

Serum Metabolic Profiling Identifies a Biomarker Panel for Improvement of Prostate Cancer Diagnosis.

Huan Xu, Junyi Chen, Jingyi He, Jin Ji, Zhi Cao, Xi Chen, Yalong Xu, Xing He, Guowang Xu, Lina Zhou and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Huan XuDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Junyi ChenDepartment of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China.
Jingyi HeDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Jiangsu, China.
Jin JiDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Zhi CaoDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Xi ChenDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Yalong XuDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Xing HeDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Guowang XuDalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian, China.
Lina ZhouDalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian, China.
Xuedong WeiDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Jiangsu, China.
Jianquan HouDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Jiangsu, China.
Zhong WangDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Bo YangDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Fubo WangDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo identify and validate a biomarker panel by serum metabolic profiling for improvement of PCa diagnosis. MATERIALS AND

methodsTotally, 134 individuals were included in this study. Among them, 39 PCa patients and 45 control patients (negative prostate biopsy) were involved in the discovery phase and 50 healthy controls were enrolled for validation phase of metabolomics study. LC-MS Analysis was used for the identification of the serum metabolites of patients.

resultsLogistics regression analysis shows that 5 metabolites [dMePE(18:0/18:2), PC(16:0/20:2), PS(15:0/18:2), SM(d16:0/24:1], Carnitine C14:0) were significantly changed in PCa patients compared with control patients. A metabolic panel (MET) was calculated, showing a significantly higher diagnostic performance than PSA in differentiating PCa from control patients [AUC (MET

conclusionsThe metabolite biomarker panel discovered in this study presents a good diagnostic performance for the detection of PCa.

Indexed as

biomarkerearly diagnosismetabolic panelmetabolic profilingprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID34026644
PMCPMC8138432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.