Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34026618›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

Endoscopic, Endonasal Transsphenoidal Surgery for Tumors of the Sellar and Suprasellar Region: A Monocentric Historical Cohort Study of 369 Patients.

Laura Van Gerven, Zhen Qian, Anastasiya Starovoyt, Mark Jorissen, Jeroen Meulemans, Johannes van Loon, Steven De Vleeschouwer, Julie Lambert, Marie Bex, Vincent Vander Poorten

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laura Van GervenOtorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Zhen QianOtorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Anastasiya StarovoytDepartment of Neurosciences, Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Mark JorissenOtorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Jeroen MeulemansOtorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Johannes van LoonNeurosciences, Research Group Experimental Neurosurgery and Neuroanatomy and Leuven Brain Institute, Leuven, Belgium.
Steven De VleeschouwerNeurosciences, Research Group Experimental Neurosurgery and Neuroanatomy and Leuven Brain Institute, Leuven, Belgium.
Julie LambertRadiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Marie BexEndocrinology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Vincent Vander PoortenOtorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BEVIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach (EETA) is an established technique for the resection of a large variety of benign sellar and suprasellar lesions, mostly pituitary adenomas. It has clear advantages over the microscopic approach, like a superior close-up view of the relevant anatomy and the tumor-gland interface, an enlarged working angle, as well as an increased panoramic vision inside the surgical area. We have been performing the EETA for over a decade, and this study will focus on perioperative and postoperative outcomes and complications and their association with the learning curve. MATERIAL AND

methodsAll patients in our tertiary referral center (n = 369) undergoing an EETA for a lesion of the sellar and suprasellar region between January 1

resultsMedian follow-up after surgery was 55 months. Pituitary adenomas (n = 322) were the most frequent pathology. Headache (43.4%) and loss of vision (29.3%) were the most common presenting symptoms. Median procedure duration was significantly longer during the initial 5 years (106

conclusionThe EETA is an excellent technique with complication rates comparable to or even lower than those in large microsurgical series in the literature. EETA has a significant learning curve affecting the procedure duration. Throughout the first 10 years following the transition from the microscopic approach to the EETA in our cohort, the caseload increased and hospital stay was reduced, while no increase in peri- and postoperative complications was observed.

Indexed as

cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakendoscopic endonasal surgery (EES)pituitary adenomapituitary tumortranssphenoidal approaches

Identifiers

PMID34026618
PMCPMC8138557
OpenAlexW3160001355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.