Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34026602›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2021

The Role of Radiomics in Lung Cancer: From Screening to Treatment and Follow-Up.

Radouane El Ayachy, Nicolas Giraud, Paul Giraud, Catherine Durdux, Philippe Giraud, Anita Burgun, Jean Emmanuel Bibault

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Over- and underscreening for lung cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Lung cancer screening: where do we stand?Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Radiomics in Lung Metastases: A Systematic Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Radouane El AyachyRadiation Oncology Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Nicolas GiraudINSERM UMR 1138 Team 22: Information Sciences to support Personalized Medicine, Cordeliers Research Centre, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.
Paul GiraudRadiation Oncology Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Catherine DurduxRadiation Oncology Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Philippe GiraudRadiation Oncology Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Anita BurgunCancer Research and Personalized Medicine-Integrated Cancer Research Center (SIRIC), Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Jean Emmanuel BibaultRadiation Oncology Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLung cancer represents the first cause of cancer-related death in the world. Radiomics studies arise rapidly in this late decade. The aim of this review is to identify important recent publications to be synthesized into a comprehensive review of the current status of radiomics in lung cancer at each step of the patients' care.

methodsA literature review was conducted using PubMed/Medline for search of relevant peer-reviewed publications from January 2012 to June 2020.

resultsWe identified several studies at each point of patient's care: detection and classification of lung nodules (n=16), determination of histology and genomic (n=10) and finally treatment outcomes predictions (=23). We reported the methodology of those studies and their results and discuss the limitations and the progress to be made for clinical routine applications.

conclusionPromising perspectives arise from machine learning applications and radiomics based models in lung cancers, yet further data are necessary for their implementation in daily care. Multicentric collaboration and attention to quality and reproductivity of radiomics studies should be further consider.

Indexed as

lung cancerlung cancer screeningmachine learningoncologyradiomicstreatment outcome and efficiency

Identifiers

PMID34026602
PMCPMC8131863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.