Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34026433›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2021

Photodynamic-Chemodynamic Cascade Reactions for Efficient Drug Delivery and Enhanced Combination Therapy.

Sheng Wang, Guocan Yu, Weijing Yang, Zhantong Wang, Orit Jacobson, Rui Tian, Hongzhang Deng, Lisen Lin, Xiaoyuan Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Stimulus-Responsive Hydrogels as Drug Delivery Systems for Inflammation Targeted Therapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sheng WangSchool of Life Sciences Tianjin University Tianjin 300072 China.ORCID 0000-0002-4797-5310
Guocan YuLaboratory of Molecular Imaging and Nanomedicine National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering National Institutes of Health Bethesda MD 20892 USA.
Weijing YangLaboratory of Molecular Imaging and Nanomedicine National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering National Institutes of Health Bethesda MD 20892 USA.
Zhantong WangLaboratory of Molecular Imaging and Nanomedicine National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering National Institutes of Health Bethesda MD 20892 USA.
Orit JacobsonLaboratory of Molecular Imaging and Nanomedicine National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering National Institutes of Health Bethesda MD 20892 USA.
Rui TianLaboratory of Molecular Imaging and Nanomedicine National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering National Institutes of Health Bethesda MD 20892 USA.
Hongzhang DengLaboratory of Molecular Imaging and Nanomedicine National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering National Institutes of Health Bethesda MD 20892 USA.
Lisen LinMOE Key Laboratory for Analytical Science of Food Safety and Biology & Institute of Environmental Analysis and Detection College of Chemistry Fuzhou University Fuzhou 350108 China.
Xiaoyuan ChenDepartments of Diagnostic Radiology, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering National University of Singapore Singapore 117545 Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-9622-0870

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanomedicines with photodynamic therapy and reactive oxygen species (ROS)-triggered drug release capabilities are promising for cancer therapy. However, most of the nanomedicines based on ROS-responsive nanocarriers still suffer from serious ROS consumption during the triggered drug release process. Herein, a photodynamic-chemodynamic cascade strategy for the design of drug delivery nanosystem is proposed. A doxorubicin hydrochloride-loaded ROS-responsive polymersome (DOX-RPS) is prepared via the self-assembly of amphiphilic poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(linoleic acid) and poly(ethylene glycol)-(2-(1-hexyloxyethyl)-2-devinyl pyropheophorbide-α)-iron chelate (PEG-HPPH-Fe). The RPS can effectively deliver a drug to tumor site through passive targeting effect. Upon laser irradiation, the photosensitizer HPPH can efficiently generate ROS, which further causes in situ oxidation of linoleic acid chain and subsequent RPS structural destruction, permitting triggered drug release. Intriguingly, catalyzed by HPPH-Fe, ROS will be regenerated from linoleic acid peroxide through a chemodynamic process. Therefore, ROS-triggered drug release can be achieved without ROS over-consumption. The in vitro and in vivo results confirmed ROS generation, triggered drug release behavior, and potent antitumor effect of the DOX-RPS. This photodynamic-chemodynamic cascade strategy provides a promising approach for enhanced combination therapy.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibiotics, AntineoplasticCell Line, TumorCombined Modality TherapyDoxorubicinDrug Delivery SystemsDrug LiberationGliomaHumansMiceMice, NudeNanoparticlesPhotochemotherapyPhotosensitizing AgentsPolyethylene GlycolsReactive Oxygen SpeciesAntibiotics, AntineoplasticDoxorubicinPhotosensitizing AgentsPolyethylene GlycolsReactive Oxygen SpeciesSurface-Active Agentscascade reactioncombination therapynanomedicinereactive oxygen speciestriggered drug release

Identifiers

PMID34026433
PMCPMC8132047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.