Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34026394›Full record

ArticleThe mental health clinician2021

Specialty pharmacist integration into an outpatient neurology clinic improves pimavanserin access.

Sabrina Livezey, Nisha B Shah, Robert McCormick, Josh DeClercq, Leena Choi, Autumn D Zuckerman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The mental health clinician, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Factors associated with delays in multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapy initiation.Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sabrina LivezeyClinical Pharmacist, Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, sabrina.n.livezey@vumc.org.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8565-0114
Nisha B ShahPharmacist, Health Outcomes and Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2693-0372
Robert McCormickStudent Researcher, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, College of Pharmacy, Nashville, Tennessee.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2258-1382
Josh DeClercqBiostatistician, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8171-5766
Leena ChoiBiostatistician, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2544-7090
Autumn D ZuckermanProgram Director, Health Outcomes and Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8376-0691
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAccess to pimavanserin, the only Parkinson disease-related psychosis treatment approved by the FDA, is restricted by insurance requirements, a limited distribution network, and high costs. Following initiation, patients require monitoring for safety and effectiveness. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate impact of specialty pharmacist (SP) integration on time to insurance approval. Additionally, we describe a pharmacist-led monitoring program.

methodsThis was a single-center, retrospective study of adults prescribed pimavanserin by the neurology clinic from June 2016 to June 2018. Patients receiving pimavanserin externally or through clinical trials were excluded. Pre- (June 2016 to December 2016) and post-SP integration (January 2017 to June 2018) periods were assessed. Proportional odds logistic regression was performed to test association of approval time with patient characteristics (age, gender, insurance type) postintegration. Interventions were categorized as clinical care, care coordination, management of adverse event, or adherence.

resultsWe included 94 patients (32 preintegration, 62 postintegration), 80% male (n = 75) and 96% white (n = 90) with a mean age of 73 years. Median time to approval was 22 days preintegration and 3 days postintegration. Higher rates of approval (81% vs 95%) and initiation (78% vs 94%) were observed postintegration. Proportional odds logistic regression suggested patients with commercial insurance were likely to have longer time to approval compared with patients with Medicare/Medicaid (odds ratio 7.1; 95% confidence interval: 1.9, 26.7;

conclusionMedian time to approval decreased postintegration. The SP performed valuable monitoring and interventions.

Indexed as

limited distributionmedication accesspimavanserinspecialty pharmacy

Identifiers

PMID34026394
PMCPMC8120983
OpenAlexW3162113807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.