Mapping open knowledge institutions: an exploratory analysis of Australian universities.

Chun-Kai Karl Huang, Katie Wilson, Cameron Neylon, Alkim Ozaygen, Lucy Montgomery, Richard Hosking

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

1citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

Transparency in conducting and reporting research: A survey of authors, reviewers, and editors across scholarly disciplines.PloS one · 2023
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chun-Kai Karl HuangCentre for Culture and Technology, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia.

Katie WilsonCentre for Culture and Technology, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8705-1027

Cameron NeylonCentre for Culture and Technology, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0068-716X

Alkim OzaygenCentre for Culture and Technology, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6813-8362

Lucy MontgomeryCentre for Culture and Technology, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6551-8140

Richard HoskingCentre for Culture and Technology, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8288-5241

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the movement for open research has gained momentum in recent years, there remain concerns about the broader commitment to openness in knowledge production and dissemination. Increasingly, universities are under pressure to transform themselves to engage with the wider community and to be more inclusive.

Indexed as

AltmetricsDiversityHigher educationOpen accessOpen knowledge institutionsOpen researchPrincipal componentScholarly communicationScientometricsUniversities

Identifiers

PMID34026359

DOI10.7717/peerj.11391

PMCPMC8121066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.