Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34026355›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2021

Morphological variability and genetic diversity in

Helena Więcław, Magdalena Szenejko, Thea Kull, Zofia Sotek, Ewa Rębacz-Maron, Jacob Koopman

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Helena WięcławInstitute of Marine and Environmental Sciences, University of Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland.
Magdalena SzenejkoInstitute of Marine and Environmental Sciences, University of Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland.
Thea KullInstitute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu, Estonia.
Zofia SotekInstitute of Marine and Environmental Sciences, University of Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland.
Ewa Rębacz-MaronInstitute of Biology, University of Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland.
Jacob KoopmanUnaffiliated, Choszczno, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background

methodsThe sedges were collected during botanical expeditions to Armenia, Estonia, the Netherlands, and Poland. The morphological separation of the two species and their populations was tested using the Discriminant Function Analysis (DFA). The genetic variability of the 19

resultsResults of the study indicate a considerable genetic affinity between the two sedge species (mean Si = 0.619). However, the populations of

conclusionsThe taxonomic status of the putative infraspecific taxa within

Indexed as

Discriminant function analysisGenetic affinityIntra- and interpopulation variabilityISSR polymorphismPhenotypic plasticityRacemosae

Identifiers

PMID34026355
PMCPMC8121068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.