Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34026323›Full record

ArticleJournal of European CME2021

Experiences from Two Ways of Integrating Pre- and Post-course Multiple-choice Assessment Questions in Educational Events for Surgeons.

Monica Ghidinelli, Michael Cunningham, Isobel C Monotti, Nishma Hindocha, Alain Rickli, Iain McVicar, Mark Glyde

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of European CME, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Main facial anatomical concerns of dentists to perform botox injections.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Monica GhidinelliAO Education Institute, AO Foundation, Duebendorf, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7378-6273
Michael CunninghamCollege of Veterinary Medicine/School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4275-0454
Isobel C MonottiCollege of Veterinary Medicine/School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia.
Nishma HindochaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7691-0751
Alain RickliAO Education Institute, AO Foundation, Duebendorf, Switzerland.
Iain McVicarMaxillofacial Unit, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Mark GlydeCollege of Veterinary Medicine/School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1433-7694

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To examine how to optimise the integration of multiple-choice questions (MCQs) for learning in continuing professional development (CPD) events in surgery, we implemented and evaluated two methods in two subspecialities over multiple years. The same 12 MCQs were administered pre- and post-event in 66 facial trauma courses. Two different sets of 10 MCQs were administered pre- and post-event in 21 small animal fracture courses. We performed standard psychometric tests on responses from participants who completed both the pre- and post-event assessment. The average difficulty index pre-course was 57% with a discrimination index of 0.20 for small animal fractures and 53% with a discrimination index of 0.15 for facial trauma. For the majority of the individual MCQs, the scores were between 30%-70% and the discrimination index was >0.10. The difficulty index post-course increased in both groups (to 75% and 62%). The pre-course MCQs resulted in an average score in the expected range for both formats suggesting they were appropriate for the intended level of difficulty and an appropriate pre-course learning activity. Post-course completion resulted in increased scores with both formats. Both delivery methods worked well in all regions and overall quality depends on applying a solid item development and validation process.

Indexed as

assessmentcmecpddifficulty indexMCQpsychometric testvalidation

Identifiers

PMID34026323
PMCPMC8128219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.