Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34026291›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced research2021

A risk prediction model of gene signatures in ovarian cancer through bagging of GA-XGBoost models.

Yi-Wen Hsiao, Chun-Liang Tao, Eric Y Chuang, Tzu-Pin Lu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yi-Wen HsiaoDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chun-Liang TaoDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Eric Y ChuangBioinformatics and Biostatistics Core, Center of Genomic and Precision Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Tzu-Pin LuDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
National Taiwan University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Ovarian cancer (OC) is one of the most frequent gynecologic cancers among women, and high-accuracy risk prediction techniques are essential to effectively select the best intervention strategies and clinical management for OC patients at different risk levels. Current risk prediction models used in OC have low sensitivity, and few of them are able to identify OC patients at high risk of mortality, which would both optimize the treatment of high-risk patients and prevent unnecessary medical intervention in those at low risk. Objectives: To this end, we have developed a bagging-based algorithm with GA-XGBoost models that predicts the risk of death from OC using gene expression profiles. Methods: Four gene expression datasets from public sources were used as training (n = 1) or validation (n = 3) sets. The performance of our proposed algorithm was compared with fine-tuning and other existing methods. Moreover, the biological function of selected genetic features was further interpreted, and the response to a panel of approved drugs was predicted for different risk levels. Results: The proposed algorithm showed good sensitivity (74-100%) in the validation sets, compared with two simple models whose sensitivity only reached 47% and 60%. The prognostic gene signature used in this study was highly connected to Conclusion: These findings demonstrated an improvement in the sensitivity of risk classification of OC patients with our risk prediction models compared with other methods. Ongoing effort is needed to validate the outcomes of this approach for precise clinical treatment.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialFemaleGene ExpressionGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMachine LearningModels, TheoreticalOvarian NeoplasmsPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPrognosisProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktRisk AssessmentSurvival RateTOR Serine-Threonine KinasesMTOR protein, humanPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktTOR Serine-Threonine KinasesBagging algorithmGA-XGBoostGene expressionMachine learningOvarian cancerRisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID34026291
PMCPMC8132202
OpenAlexW3105352306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.