Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34026210›Full record

ArticleNetwork science (Cambridge University Press)2021

Social Network Change after Moving into Permanent Supportive Housing: Who Stays and Who Goes?

Harmony Rhoades, Hsun-Ta Hsu, Eric Rice, Taylor Harris, Wichada LaMotte-Kerr, Hailey Winetrobe, Benjamin Henwood, Suzanne Wenzel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Network science (Cambridge University Press), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Harmony RhoadesUniversity of Southern California, Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, Montgomery Ross Fisher Building, Los Angeles, CA 90089.
Hsun-Ta HsuUniversity of Missouri, School of Social Work, 709 Clark Hall, Columbia, MO 65211.
Eric RiceUniversity of Southern California, Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, Montgomery Ross Fisher Building, Los Angeles, CA 90089.
Taylor HarrisUniversity of Southern California, Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, Montgomery Ross Fisher Building, Los Angeles, CA 90089.
Wichada LaMotte-KerrUniversity of Southern California, Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, Montgomery Ross Fisher Building, Los Angeles, CA 90089.
Hailey WinetrobeUniversity of Southern California, Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, Montgomery Ross Fisher Building, Los Angeles, CA 90089.
Benjamin HenwoodUniversity of Southern California, Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, Montgomery Ross Fisher Building, Los Angeles, CA 90089.
Suzanne WenzelUniversity of Southern California, Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, Montgomery Ross Fisher Building, Los Angeles, CA 90089.

Funding

HIV Risk, Drug Use, Social Networks: Homeless Persons Transitioned to HousingR01DA036345 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI WENZEL, SUZANNE L · 2014 to 2017
$2.7M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA036345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social relationships are important among persons experiencing homelessness, but there is little research on changes in social networks among persons moving into permanent supportive housing (PSH). Using data collected as part of a longitudinal study of 405 adults (aged 39+) moving into PSH, this study describes network upheaval during this critical time of transition. Interviews conducted prior to and after three months of living in PSH assessed individual-level characteristics (demographics, homelessness history, health and mental health) and included a social network component that assessed network size and composition (demographics, relationship type, social support); interviewers utilized network member characteristics to assess whether network members were new or sustained between baseline and 3 months post-housing. Multilevel logistic regression models assessed what characteristics of network members were associated with being newly-gained or persisting in networks 3 months after moving into PSH. We found that only one-third of social networks were retained during the transition to PSH, and that veterans, African Americans and other persons of racial/ethnic minorities, and those living in scattered-site housing were more likely to experience network disruption. Relatives, romantic partners, and service providers were most likely to be retained after move-in. Some network change was moderated by tie strength, including the retention of street-met persons. Implications are discussed.

Indexed as

Homelessnessnetwork changepermanent supportive housingsocial networks

Identifiers

PMID34026210
PMCPMC8135224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.