ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2021
Leiomyomatosis peritonealis dissemianata five years after laparoscopic uterine myomectomy: A case report.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Leiomyomatosis peritonealis disseminata with omental involvement: a case report.Frontiers in global women's health · 2026Article
- Exploring the Evolution of Leiomyomatosis Peritonealis Disseminata: A Longitudinal Study on Malignant Transformation and Potential Biomarkers.Clinical medicine & research · 2025Article
- Diagnosing Disseminated Peritoneal Leiomyomatosis: Malignancy-Like Presentation in a 59-Year-Old Woman.The American journal of case reports · 2025Article
- Case report: Magnetic resonance imaging findings of patients with diffuse uterine leiomyomatosis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Article
- To Laparoscopically Preserve Fertility in Intraabdominal Giant Myoma with Application of Contained In-Bag Morcellation: Mission Impossible?Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLeiomyomatosis peritonealis disseminata (LPD) is a rare disease that can be challenging to diagnose. In this report, we present a case of LPD arising 5 years after laparoscopic uterine myomectomy using a power morcellator. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 32-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital with complaints of vaginal bleeding and abdominal discomfort. Five years previously, she had undergone laparoscopic uterine myomectomy using a power morcellator. Pelvic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated multiple pelvic tumors closely attached to peritoneum with no indication of malignancy. An exploratory laparotomy revealed multiple sites of leiomyomatosis in the peritoneum, especially on the parietal peritoneum at the port site of the previous laparoscopic surgery. We surgically removed all visible tumors and performed a total hysterectomy. Histologic examination confirmed the diagnosis of LPD. DISCUSSION: The use of a power morcellator without in-bag containment system might have played a role in the pathogenesis of LPD in our case. Ultrasonography, computed tomography, and MRI are among the most effective to distinguish between leiomyomas and other solid tumors in the pelvis, but they are not of great help in the differential diagnosis of malignancies.
conclusionThe physicians need to combine medical history, clinical findings, imaging techniques and histopathological examination to establish a correct diagnosis of LPD. The application of containment bags in the setting of power morcellation should be considered to reduce the risk of developing LPD. The optimal intervention strategy should be chosen according to the particular features of each patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.