Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34026021›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2021

The declining occurrence of moose (

Tomáš Janík, Wibke Peters, Martin Šálek, Dušan Romportl, Miloslav Jirků, Thomas Engleder, Martin Ernst, Jiří Neudert, Marco Heurich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Novel Insight intoPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The declining occurrence of moose (Ecology and evolution · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tomáš JaníkFaculty of Science Department of Physical Geography and Geoecology Charles University Praha Czechia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0111-9754
Wibke PetersBavarian State Institute of Forestry Freising Germany.
Martin ŠálekCzech Academy of Sciences Institute of Vertebrate Biology Brno Czechia.
Dušan RomportlFaculty of Science Department of Physical Geography and Geoecology Charles University Praha Czechia.
Miloslav JirkůBiology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences Institute of Parasitology České Budějovice Czechia.
Thomas EnglederGreen Heart of Europe Haslach AT Austria.
Martin ErnstFaculty of Forestry and Wood Technology Department of Forest Protection and Wildlife Management Mendel University in Brno Brno Czechia.
Jiří NeudertAdministration of Třeboňsko Protected Landscape Area and Biospheric Reservation Třeboň Czechia.
Marco HeurichDepartment of Visitor Management and National Park Monitoring Bavarian Forest National Park Grafenau Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The border region between Austria, the Czech Republic, and Germany harbors the most south-western occurrence of moose in continental Europe. The population originated in Poland, where moose survived, immigrated from former Soviet Union or were reintroduced after the Second World War expanded west- and southwards. In recent years, the distribution of the nonetheless small Central European population seems to have declined, necessitating an evaluation of its current status. In this study, existing datasets of moose observations from 1958 to 2019 collected in the three countries were combined to create a database totaling 771 records (observations and deaths). The database was then used to analyze the following: (a) changes in moose distribution, (b) the most important mortality factors, and (c) the availability of suitable habitat as determined using a maximum entropy approach. The results showed a progressive increase in the number of moose observations after 1958, with peaks in the 1990s and around 2010, followed by a relatively steep drop after 2013. Mortality within the moose population was mostly due to human interactions, including 13 deadly wildlife-vehicle collisions, particularly on minor roads, and four animals that were either legally culled or poached. Our habitat model suggested that higher altitudes (ca. 700-1,000 m a.s.l.), especially those offering wetlands, broad-leaved forests and natural grasslands, are the preferred habitats of moose whereas steep slopes and areas of human activity are avoided. The habitat model also revealed the availability of large core areas of suitable habitat beyond the current distribution, suggesting that habitat was not the limiting factor explaining the moose distribution in the study area. Our findings call for immediate transboundary conservation measures to sustain the moose population, such as those aimed at preventing wildlife-vehicle collisions and illegal killings. Infrastructure planning and development activities must take into account the habitat requirements of moose.

Indexed as

Bohemian Forest EcosystemHabitat suitability modellingMoose (alces alces)

Identifiers

PMID34026021
PMCPMC8131793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.