Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34025745›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental science and technology : IJEST2022

A critical review of biogas production and usage with legislations framework across the globe.

S Abanades, H Abbaspour, A Ahmadi, B Das, M A Ehyaei, F Esmaeilion, M El Haj Assad, T Hajilounezhad, D H Jamali, A Hmida and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental science and technology : IJEST, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

S AbanadesProcesses, Materials, and Solar Energy Laboratory, PROMES-CNRS, 7 Rue du Four Solaire, 66120 Font-Romeu, France.
H AbbaspourDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Biological Science, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
A AhmadiSchool of New Technologies, Iran University of Science & Technology, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran.
B DasDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Silchar, Silchar, Asaam 788010 India.
M A EhyaeiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Pardis Branch, Islamic Azad University, Pardis New City, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-4721-9427
F EsmaeilionDepartment of Energy Systems Engineering, School of Advance Technologies, Iran University of Science & Technology (IUST), Tehran, Iran.
M El Haj AssadSustainable & Renewable Energy Engineering Department, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
T HajilounezhadDepartment of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO USA.
D H JamaliSchool of Environment, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
A HmidaR, L. Applied Thermodynamic, National Engineering School of Gabes, University of Gabes, Gabes, Tunisia.
H A OzgoliDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Iranian Research Organization for Science and Technology (IROST), Sh. Ehsani Rad St., Enqelab StParsa SqAhmadabad Mostoufi RdAzadegan Highway, 3313193685 Tehran, Iran.
S SafariDepartment of Energy Engineering, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University (IAU), Daneshgah Blvd, Simon Bolivar Blvd, 1477893855 Tehran, Iran.
M AlShabiDepartment of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE.
E H Bani-HaniDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, Australian College of Kuwait, Kuwait City, Kuwait.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review showcases a comprehensive analysis of studies that highlight the different conversion procedures attempted across the globe. The resources of biogas production along with treatment methods are presented. The effect of different governing parameters like feedstock types, pretreatment approaches, process development, and yield to enhance the biogas productivity is highlighted. Biogas applications, for example, in heating, electricity production, and transportation with their global share based on national and international statistics are emphasized. Reviewing the world research progress in the past 10 years shows an increase of ~ 90% in biogas industry (120 GW in 2019 compared to 65 GW in 2010). Europe (e.g., in 2017) contributed to over 70% of the world biogas generation representing 64 TWh. Finally, different regulations that manage the biogas market are presented. Management of biogas market includes the processes of exploration, production, treatment, and environmental impact assessment, till the marketing and safe disposal of wastes associated with biogas handling. A brief overview of some safety rules and proposed policy based on the world regulations is provided. The effect of these regulations and policies on marketing and promoting biogas is highlighted for different countries. The results from such studies show that Europe has the highest promotion rate, while nowadays in China and India the consumption rate is maximum as a result of applying up-to-date policies and procedures.

Indexed as

ApplicationBiogasElectricityHeating

Identifiers

PMID34025745
PMCPMC8124099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.