Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34025731›Full record

ArticleJournal of contemporary brachytherapy2021

Salvage brachytherapy for locally recurrent prostate cancer after single-fraction 19 Gy high-dose-rate brachytherapy: toxicity, prostate-specific antigen kinetics, and cancer control.

Esther Mayrata, Jose Maria Espinosa, David Büchser, Francisco Casquero, Fernan Suárez, Alba González, Pablo Minguez, Jose Fernando Pérez, Iñigo San Miguel, Jon Cacicedo and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of contemporary brachytherapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Esther MayrataRadiation Oncology, Cruces University Hospital/Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain.
Jose Maria EspinosaDepartment of Radiation Physics, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Spain.
David BüchserRadiation Oncology, Cruces University Hospital/Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain.
Francisco CasqueroRadiation Oncology, Cruces University Hospital/Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain.
Fernan SuárezRadiation Oncology, Cruces University Hospital/Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain.
Alba GonzálezRadiation Oncology, Cruces University Hospital/Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain.
Pablo MinguezDepartment of Radiation Physics, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Spain.
Jose Fernando PérezDepartment of Radiation Physics, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Spain.
Iñigo San MiguelRadiation Oncology, Cruces University Hospital/Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain.
Jon CacicedoRadiation Oncology, Cruces University Hospital/Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain.
Alfonso Gómez-IturriagaRadiation Oncology, Cruces University Hospital/Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain.
Hospital de Cruces · ESBioCruces Health research Institute · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate toxicity, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics, and cancer control of high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) as a salvage modality for men with locally recurrent prostate cancer, after primary HDR-BT failure. MATERIAL AND

methodsTwelve patients with biochemical failure and a local relapse after 19 Gy single-fraction high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT 19 Gy) were salvaged using two HDR-BT fractions. Salvage treatment consisted of two HDR-BT applications, one week apart, delivering 12 Gy to the prostate per application (HDR-BT 12 × 2).

resultsMedian age and initial PSA prior to rescue treatment were 74 years (range, 65-80) and 5.29 ng/ml (range, 2.37-16.40), respectively. Forty-two percent had a low-risk and 58% presented with intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Median follow-up period was 26 months (range, 10-42). Median time to PSA nadir was 12 months, with a median value of 0.21 ng/ml. Most of the patients (11 of 12) achieved a PSA decline ≥ 90%. Acute grade 2 genitourinary (GU) toxicity occurred in 4 patients (33.3%) and none presented with acute gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. Two patients (16.7%) suffered from late GU grade 2 toxicity. No grade 3 toxicity were recorded. To date, 2 patients (16.7%) have experienced biochemical failure after salvage treatment.

conclusionsSalvage HDR-BT 12 × 2 is a feasible and well-tolerated treatment, with acceptable toxicity rates for men with locally recurrent prostate cancer, who failed after HDR-BT with 19 Gy. Moreover, PSA kinetics and cancer control after salvage treatment suggest that this strategy might be efficacious in this clinical setting.

Indexed as

high-dose-rate brachytherapyprostate cancerrecurrent prostate cancersalvage brachytherapy

Identifiers

PMID34025731
PMCPMC8117711
OpenAlexW3130086359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.