Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34025522›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2021

Cross-Cultural Analysis of Spiritual Bypass: A Comparison Between Spain and Honduras.

Alejandra Motiño, Jesús Saiz, Iván Sánchez-Iglesias, María Salazar, Tiffany J Barsotti, Tamara L Goldsby, Deepak Chopra, Paul J Mills

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alejandra MotiñoDepartment of Social, Work and Differential Psychology, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Jesús SaizDepartment of Social, Work and Differential Psychology, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Iván Sánchez-IglesiasDepartment of Psychobiology and Behavioral Sciences Methods, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
María SalazarDepartment of Social, Work and Differential Psychology, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Tiffany J BarsottiDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Tamara L GoldsbyDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Deepak ChopraDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Paul J MillsDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Universidad Complutense de Madrid · ESUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Religion and spirituality (R/S) serve as coping mechanisms for circumstances that threaten people's psychological well-being. However, using R/S inappropriately to deal with difficulties and problems in daily life may include the practice of Spiritual Bypass (SB). SB refers to avoiding addressing emotional problems and trauma, rather than healing and learning from them. On the other hand, coping strategies may be determined by the cultural context. This study aims to describe the presence of SB in individuals who may have experienced stressful situations and to understand the influence of culture on SB by comparing SB in two culturally different groups. The sample consists of a total of 435 people, 262 of Honduran nationality and 173 of Spanish nationality. Both groups are approximately equivalent in age and gender. The degree of SB, stressful events, perception of social support and spiritual well-being are examined, respectively, through the Spiritual Bypass Scale, and specific items and subscales from the Social Readjustment Rating Scale, Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, and the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Spiritual Wellbeing. The results showed a higher spiritual well-being and use of SB in the Honduran sample as compared to the Spanish sample, but similar social support and stressful events. Furthermore, some of the factors predicting SB were different between the two samples. While age and a greater number of R/S practices were important in both samples, for the Honduran sample the variables that best explained SB were being a Christian, having greater social support, fewer stressful events, and greater attendance at church or temple. For the Spanish sample, however, the variable that best explained SB was studying R/S texts. Therefore, SB must be understood within the culture in which it develops, since in different cultural contexts it appears to relate to differing factors. Thus, SB becomes a possible functional or dysfunctional coping strategy depending on the social context.

Indexed as

cross-cultural analysissocial supportspiritual bypassspiritual well-beingstressful events

Identifiers

PMID34025522
PMCPMC8134675
OpenAlexW3159830094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.