Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34025296›Full record

ArticlePublic opinion quarterly2020

Understanding Willingness to Share Smartphone-Sensor Data.

Bella Struminskaya, Vera Toepoel, Peter Lugtig, Marieke Haan, Annemieke Luiten, Barry Schouten

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public opinion quarterly, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
13.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A new experiment on the use of images to answer web survey questions.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, (Statistics in Society) · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bella StruminskayaAssistant professor in the Department of Methodology and Statistics at Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Vera ToepoelProfessor in the Department of Methodology and Statistics at Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Peter LugtigAssociate professor in the Department of Methodology and Statistics at Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Marieke HaanAssistant professor in the Department of Sociology at the University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Annemieke LuitenData collection specialist at Statistics Netherlands, Heerlen, the Netherlands.
Barry SchoutenSenior methodologist at Statistics Netherlands, The Hague, the Netherlands, and professor in the Department of Methodology and Statistics at Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Utrecht University · NLCentraal Bureau voor de Statistiek · NLUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing smartphone penetration and the integration of smartphones into people's everyday practices offer researchers opportunities to augment survey measurement with smartphone-sensor measurement or to replace self-reports. Potential benefits include lower measurement error, a widening of research questions, collection of

Identifiers

PMID34025296
PMCPMC8130979
OpenAlexW3130849573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.