ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2021
Standard
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Diagnostic Performance of Linked Color Imaging Compared to White Light Imaging in Endoscopic Diagnosis ofGut and liver · 2024Pooled it
- Novel endoscopic techniques for the diagnosis of gastricFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Pooled it
- Signaling pathways and targeted interventions for precancers.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- Diagnostic value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in identifying gastritis in children with chronic abdominal pain in northern Iran.BMC research notes · 2025Article
- Topic highlight on texture and color enhancement imaging in gastrointestinal diseases.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Could near focus endoscopy, narrow-band imaging, and acetic acid improve the visualization of microscopic features of stomach mucosa?World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2024Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Narrow-Band Imaging in Predicting Helicobacter pylori Gastritis in Patients With Dyspepsia.Cureus · 2024Article
- Simultaneous detection of Helicobacter pylori infection comparing between white light and image-enhanced endoscopy.BMC gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Histopathological features of glandular atrophy of the lamina propria of the gastric mucosa during its occurrence and development.BMC gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Kyoto classification of gastritis: Advances and future perspectives in endoscopic diagnosis of gastritis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Role of magnifying narrow-band imaging endoscopy for diagnosis ofWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdvances in endoscopic imaging enable the identification of patients at high risk of gastric cancer. However, there are no comparative data on the utility of standard and magnifying narrow-band imaging (M-NBI) endoscopy for diagnosing
aimTo compare the diagnostic performance of standard and M-NBI endoscopy for
methodsIn 254 patients, standard endoscopy findings were classified into mosaic-like appearance (type A), diffuse homogenous redness (type B), and irregular redness with groove (type C). Gastric mucosal patterns visualized by M-NBI were classified as regular round pits with polygonal sulci (type Z-1), more dilated and linear pits without sulci (type Z-2), and loss of gastric pits with coiled vessels (type Z-3).
resultsThe diagnostic accuracy of standard and M-NBI endoscopy for
conclusionClose observation of the gastric mucosa by standard and M-NBI endoscopy is useful for the diagnosis of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.