Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34025008›Full record

ArticleAgricultural systems2021

Identifying 'win-win-win' futures from inequitable value chain trade-offs: A system dynamics approach.

Gregory S Cooper, Karl M Rich, Bhavani Shankar, Vinay Rana, Nazmun N Ratna, Suneetha Kadiyala, Mohammad J Alam, Sharan B Nadagouda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Agricultural systems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gregory S CooperCentre for Development, Environment and Policy (CeDEP), School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), London, United Kingdom.
Karl M RichInternational Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), West Africa Regional Office, Dakar, Senegal.
Bhavani ShankarInstitute for Sustainable Food, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Vinay RanaTransform Rural India Foundation (TRIF), Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.
Nazmun N RatnaDepartment of Global Value Chain & Trade, Faculty of Agribusiness and Commerce, Lincoln University, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Suneetha KadiyalaDepartment for Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), London, United Kingdom.
Mohammad J AlamDepartment of Agribusiness and Marketing, Bangladesh Agricultural University (BAU), Mymensingh, Bangladesh.
Sharan B NadagoudaDigital Green, East India Office, Patna, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextThere is growing recognition that food systems must adapt to become more sustainable and equitable. Consequently, in developing country contexts, there is increasing momentum away from traditional producer-facing value chain upgrades towards efforts to increase both the availability and affordability of nutritious foods at the consumer level. However, such goals must navigate the inherent complexities of agricultural value chains, which involve multiple interactions, feedbacks and unintended consequences, including important but often surprising trade-offs between producers and consumers. OBJECTIVE AND

methodsBased around the 'Loop' horticultural aggregation scheme of Digital Green in Bihar, India, we develop a system dynamics modelling framework to survey the value chain trade-offs emerging from upgrades that aim to improve the availability of fruits and vegetables in small retail-oriented markets. We model the processes of horticultural production, aggregation, marketing, and retailing - searching for futures that are 'win-win-win' for: (i) the availability of fruits and vegetables in small retail markets, (ii) the profits of farmers participating in aggregation, and (iii) the sustainability of the initial scheme for Digital Green as an organisation. We simulate two internal upgrades to aggregation and two upgrades to the wider enabling environment through a series of 5000 Monte Carlo trajectories - designed to explore the plausible future dynamics of the three outcome dimensions relative to the baseline.

resultsWe find that 'win-win-win' futures cannot be achieved by internal changes to the aggregation scheme alone, emerging under a narrow range of scenarios that boost supplies to the small retail market whilst simultaneously supporting the financial takeaways of farmers. In contrast, undesirable producer versus consumer trade-offs emerge as unintended consequences of scaling-up aggregation and the introduction of market-based cold storage. SIGNIFICANCE: This approach furthers ongoing efforts to capture complex value chain processes, outcomes and upgrades within system dynamics modelling frameworks, before scanning the horizon of plausible external scenarios, internal dynamics and unintended trade-offs to identify 'win-win-win' futures for all.

Indexed as

Agricultural marketingFruits and vegetablesIndiaPlausible futuresSystem dynamics model

Identifiers

PMID34025008
PMCPMC8121761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.