ArticleAmerican journal of surgery2021
Comparing intraoperative parathyroid identification based on surgeon experience versus near infrared autofluorescence detection - A surgeon-blinded multi-centric study.
Article in American journal of surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05152927 (Evaluating Impact of Near Infrared Autofluorescence), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluating Impact of Near Infrared Autofluorescence (NIRAF) Detection for Identifying Parathyroid Glands During Parathyroidectomy
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Meta-Analysis of Image-Based Versus Probe-Based Parathyroid Near-Infrared Autofluorescence.Cureus · 2025Review
- Fluorescence intensity of parathyroid glands in thyroid and parathyroid surgery: a near-infrared autofluorescence study.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Exploring near-infrared autofluorescence properties in parathyroid tissue: an analysis of fresh and paraffin-embedded thyroidectomy specimens.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025Article
- Advancing parathyroid surgery: a critical examination of probe-based near-infrared autofluorescence technology.Gland surgery · 2024Article
- Autofluorescence-Guided Total Thyroidectomy in Low-Volume, Nonparathyroid Institutions.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- An automatic parathyroid recognition and segmentation model based on deep learning of near-infrared autofluorescence imaging.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- The magic mirror: a novel intraoperative monitoring method for parathyroid glands.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Review
- Engineering functional 3-dimensional patient-derived endocrine organoids for broad multiplatform applications.Surgery · 2023Article
- The Year in Thyroidology: Surgical Science.Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association · 2023Article
- Update on the Diagnosis and Management of Medullary Thyroid Cancer: What Has Changed in Recent Years?Cancers · 2022Review
- A clinically relevant formulation for direct administration of nerve specific fluorophores to mitigate iatrogenic nerve injury.Biomaterials · 2022Article
- Heterogeneity in Utilization of Optical Imaging Guided Surgery for Identifying or Preserving the Parathyroid Glands-A Meta-Narrative Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- A pilot feasibility study to assess vascularity and perfusion of parathyroid glands using a portable hand-held imager.Lasers in surgery and medicine · 2022Article
- Thyroidectomy for Cancer: The Surgeon and the Parathyroid Glands Sparing.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNear infrared autofluorescence (NIRAF) detection has previously demonstrated significant potential for real-time parathyroid gland identification. However, the performance of a NIRAF detection device - PTeye® - remains to be evaluated relative to a surgeon's own ability to identify parathyroid glands.
methodsPatients eligible for thyroidectomy and/or parathyroidectomy were enrolled under 6 endocrine surgeons at 3 high-volume institutions. Participating surgeons were categorized based on years of experience. All surgeons were blinded to output of PTeye® when identifying tissues. The surgeon's performance for parathyroid discrimination was then compared with PTeye®. Histology served as gold standard for excised specimens, while expert surgeon's opinion was used to validate in-situ tissues.
resultsPTeye® achieved 92.7% accuracy across 167 patients recruited. Junior surgeons (<5 years of experience) were found to have lower confidence in parathyroid identification and higher tissue misclassification rate per specimen when compared to PTeye® and senior surgeons (>10 years of experience).
conclusionsNIRAF detection with PTeye® can be a valuable intraoperative adjunct technology to aid in parathyroid identification for surgeons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.