Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34024536›Full record

Trial reportClinical nutrition ESPEN2021

Telemedicine as a tool for dietary intervention in NAFLD-HIV patients during the COVID-19 lockdown: A randomized controlled trial.

Sara Policarpo, Mariana V Machado, Helena Cortez-Pinto

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical nutrition ESPEN, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Fatty Liver Disease: Enter the Metabolic Era.Current HIV/AIDS reports · 2023
    Review
  9. COVID-19 and Fatty Liver Disorders.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Leveraging mHealth for the Treatment and Management of PLHIV.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. The Nutrition-COVID-19 Interplay: a Review.Current nutrition reports · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sara PolicarpoCentro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Serviço de Dietética e Nutrição, Lisboa, Portugal; Laboratório de Nutrição, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal. Electronic address: sara.policarpo@chln.min-saude.pt.
Mariana V MachadoCentro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Departamento de Gastrenterologia, Lisboa, Portugal; Clínica Universitária de Gastroenterlogia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.
Helena Cortez-PintoLaboratório de Nutrição, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal; Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Departamento de Gastrenterologia, Lisboa, Portugal; Clínica Universitária de Gastroenterlogia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.
University of Lisbon · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsGiven reports of changes in dietary habits during covid-19 lockdown, our aim was to assess weight changes, over a 3-month Covid-19 national lockdown in a cohort of NAFLD-HIV patients on a dietary intervention trial.

methodsAfter NAFLD screening in an outpatient Infectious Diseases Clinic, NAFLD patients were randomly allocated to general dietary recommendations (SC group) or to a structured dietary intervention based on the Mediterranean diet (intervention group). During lockdown, follow-up consultations in the intervention group were done by video and/or phone. After 3 months of lockdown, all patients (intervention and SC group) consented to a telephone interview which aimed to characterize eating habits and lifestyle changes and evaluate stress and depression. Biochemical data when available, was compared between the peri-period of confinement.

resultsOne hundred and twelve patients were screened. From the 55 NAFDL identified, 27 were allocated to dietary intervention and 28 to SC and were followed before lockdown for a mean period of 5.0 ± 1.5 months in which SC group gained a median of 0.65 kg vs. a median loss of 1.5 kg in the intervention group (p < 0.001). During lockdown, 93.3% of patients in the SC group referred that "diet got worse" vs. 6.7% in the intervention group p < 0.01), and 35.3% vs. 15.7% (p = 0.014) reported increase in appetite, respectively. Both groups gained weight, SC group vs. 0.7 ± 1.7 kg in the intervention group, p < 0.001). Higher weight gain was associated with changes in the dietary pattern (3.8 ± 2.1 kg vs. 2.0 ± 1.3 kg in "no change in dietary pattern"; p = 0.002). Glucose blood levels increased after lockdown in the SC group, with a mean increase of 15 mg/dl (p = 0.023). The remaining metabolic parameters remained unchanged.

conclusionThe maintenance of dietary intervention, using telemedicine, can mitigate the adverse change in dietary habits and physical activity pattern, preventing a substantial increase in body weight.

Indexed as

Body WeightCOVID-19Diet, MediterraneanPhysical DistancingTelemedicineAdultAppetiteBlood GlucoseCommunicable Disease ControlDepressionFeeding BehaviorFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansLife StyleMaleBlood GlucoseCovid-19 lockdownDietary interventionNAFLDNutrition

Identifiers

PMID34024536
PMCPMC8056479
OpenAlexW3154202836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.