Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34024310›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2021

Cryopreservation and Preparation of Thawed Spermatozoa from Rhesus Macaques (

Fernanda M de Carvalho, Cathy Ramsey, Carol B Hanna, Rodrigo Del R do Valle, Marcilio Nichi, Mario Binelli, Marcelo A B V Guimarães, Jon D Hennebold

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Liver-specific transgenic expression of human NTCP in rhesus macaques confers HBV susceptibility on primary hepatocytes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Fernanda M de CarvalhoDepartment of Animal Reproduction, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Reproductive & Developmental Sciences, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Beaverton, Oregon;, Email: decarval@ohsu.edu.
Cathy RamseyDepartment of Reproductive & Developmental Sciences, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Beaverton, Oregon.
Carol B HannaDepartment of Reproductive & Developmental Sciences, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Beaverton, Oregon.
Rodrigo Del R do VallePaulista University, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Instituto Biopesca, Santos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcilio NichiDepartment of Animal Reproduction, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Mario BinelliDepartment of Animal Reproduction, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Marcelo A B V GuimarãesDepartment of Animal Reproduction, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Jon D HenneboldDepartment of Reproductive & Developmental Sciences, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Beaverton, Oregon.
Oregon National Primate Research Center · USUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Paulista · BR

Funding

Upgrade of confocal microscopy at the Oregon National Primate Research CenterP51OD011092 · OD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Bonnie J. Nagel · 2012 to 2026
$203.9M
NIH HHS P51 OD011092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in assisted reproductive technologies in rhesus macaques have allowed the development of valuable models of human disease, particularly when combined with recent techniques for gene editing. While the ability to perform in vitro fertilization (IVF) in rhesus macaques is well established, this procedure has not yet been optimized. Specifically, damage to the sperm caused by cryopreservation (cryodamage) may lead to unsuccessful artificial insemination and low fertilization and blastocyst formation rates in vitro. To address this, we systematically assessed 2 cryopreservation methods and 4 recovery methods in the following 3 interdependent experiments: 1) comparing sperm survival after vitrification or slow-freezing; 2) comparing simple wash (SW), density gradient centrifugation (DGC), swim-up (SU), and glass wool filtration (GWF) for removal of cryoprotectants and isolation of motile sperm after thawing; and 3) evaluating the efficacy for IVF of the 2 best methods of isolating thawed sperm. We found that after vitrification, only 1.2 ± 0.3% of thawed sperm were motile, whereas after slow-freezing, 42 ± 5% of thawed sperm were motile. SW was significantly better than all other isolation methods for the recovery of total sperm and for the recovery of sperm with an intact plasma membrane. The isolation methods had no significant differences in the recovery of motile sperm or sperm with progressive motility. However, IVF of ova with sperm recovered by DGC resulted in 5% more embryos and 25% more blastocysts than did IVF with sperm recovered by SW. Although additional studies are required to optimize sperm cryopreservation in rhesus macaques, our study showed that slow-freezing, coupled with DGC, provided the highest efficacy in providing functional sperm for in vitro use.

Indexed as

Semen PreservationAnimalsCryopreservationFertilization in VitroHumansMacaca mulattaMaleSpermatozoaSperm Motility

Identifiers

PMID34024310
PMCPMC9390610
OpenAlexW3165076199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.