Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34024279›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2021

Microsurgical training course for clinicians and scientists: a 10-year experience at the Münster University Hospital.

Mazen A Juratli, Felix Becker, Daniel Palmes, Sandra Stöppeler, Ralf Bahde, Linus Kebschull, Hans-Ullrich Spiegel, Jens P Hölzen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mazen A Juratli *Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Münster University Hospital, Münster, Germany.
Felix Becker *Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Münster University Hospital, Münster, Germany.
Daniel PalmesDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Münster University Hospital, Münster, Germany.
Sandra StöppelerDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Münster University Hospital, Münster, Germany.
Ralf BahdeDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Münster University Hospital, Münster, Germany.
Linus KebschullDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Münster University Hospital, Münster, Germany.
Hans-Ullrich SpiegelDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Münster University Hospital, Münster, Germany.
Jens P HölzenDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Münster University Hospital, Münster, Germany. Jenspeter.Hoelzen@ukmuenster.de.
University Hospital Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicrosurgical techniques are an important part of clinical and experimental research. Here we present our step-by-step microsurgery training course developed at the Münster University Hospital. The goal of this course was to create a short, modular curriculum with clearly described and easy to follow working steps in accordance with the Guidelines for Training in Surgical Research in Animals by the Academy of Surgical Research.

methodsOver the course of 10 years, we conducted an annual 2.5 day (20 h) microsurgical training course with a total of 120 participants.

resultsPrior to the course, 90% of the participants reported to have never performed a microanastomosis before. During the 10 years a total of 84.2% of the participants performed microanastomoses without assistance, 15% required assistance and only 0.8% failed.

conclusionsOur step-by-step microsurgery training course gives a brief overview of the didactic basics and the organization of a microsurgical training course and could serve as a guide for teaching microsurgical skills. During the 2.5-day curriculum, it was possible to teach, and for participants to subsequently perform a microsurgical anastomosis. The independent reproducibility of the learned material after the course is not yet known, therefore further investigations are necessary. With this step-by-step curriculum, we were able to conduct a successful training program, shown by the fact that each participant is able to perform microvascular anastomoses on a reproducible basis.

Indexed as

CurriculumMicrosurgeryAnastomosis, SurgicalAnimalsClinical CompetenceHospitals, UniversityHumansReproducibility of ResultsAnastomosisCurricular trainingMicrosurgeryMicrosurgical trainingTrainingVascular anastomosis

Identifiers

PMID34024279
PMCPMC8142514
OpenAlexW3165762274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.