ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021
Growth inhibition and oxidative damage of Microcystis aeruginosa induced by aqueous extract of different submerged macrophytes.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Macrophyte Extracts Promote the Growth of the Microbial Community Associated With Microcystis aeruginosa Alleviating Allelopathic Effects.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2026Article
- Biotechnological approaches for suppressing Microcystis blooms: insights and challenges.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Allelopathic inhibition of the extracts ofPlant signaling & behavior · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
With the increasing eutrophication of the aquatic environments, cyanobacteria blooms caused certain damage to the animals and plants in the aquatic environments. In this experiment, two species were selected from six species of submerged macrophytes, the experimental conditions were changed to achieve the best inhibitory effect on Microcystis aeruginosa, and oxidative damage analysis was carried out. The experiment results demonstrated that the inhibition rate of Vallisneria natans and Ceratophyllum demersum was nearly 100% at the concentration of 3 g/L after 15 days of anaerobic soaking extract. In addition, the longer the soaking time of the two submerged macrophytes, the weaker the photosynthesis effect, and the lower the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, the more obvious the inhibition effect on M. aeruginosa. Lipid peroxidation injury of M. aeruginosa could be reflected by malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration. The MDA concentration in the experimental group was significantly higher than the control group. Results showed that V. natans and C. demersum could induce oxidative damage in M. aeruginosa. It was also observed that the secondary metabolites produced by V. natans were mainly fatty acids (e.g., the oxidative acid was 6.92 w/%, and the successful acid was 9.85 w/%) which inhibited M. aeruginosa in gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The main secondary metabolites in C. demersum were hydroxyl acids (e.g., the 4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenylacetic acid was 24.33 w/%), which could inhibit the algae through allelopathy. This study provided reference for submerged macrophytes to inhibit M. aeruginosa under different conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.