Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34023938›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2021

Effects of daily consumption of wild blueberry on cognition and urinary metabolites in school-aged children: a pilot study.

Katie Louise Barfoot, Geoffrey Istas, Rodrigo Pedro Feliciano, Daniel Joseph Lamport, Patricia Riddell, Ana Rodriguez-Mateos, Claire Michelle Williams

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Biomarkers of Berry Intake: Systematic Review Update.Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Dietary Flavonoids and Human Cognition: A Meta-Analysis.Molecular nutrition & food research · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Katie Louise BarfootSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Earley Gate, Whiteknights Road, Reading, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2866-6467
Geoffrey IstasDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, School of Life Course Sciences, Kings College London, London, UK.
Rodrigo Pedro FelicianoDivision of Cardiology, Pulmonology, and Vascular Medicine, University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Daniel Joseph LamportSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Earley Gate, Whiteknights Road, Reading, UK.
Patricia RiddellSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Earley Gate, Whiteknights Road, Reading, UK.
Ana Rodriguez-MateosDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, School of Life Course Sciences, Kings College London, London, UK.
Claire Michelle WilliamsSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Earley Gate, Whiteknights Road, Reading, UK. claire.williams@reading.ac.uk.
University of Reading · GBKing's College London · GBHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAcute intervention with wild blueberry (WBB) has previously revealed positive cognitive and mood effects in typically developing children; however, it is unclear whether effects persist after daily supplementation. In addition, no data have been published exploring the metabolite profiles of children following berry consumption, to our knowledge. A study of this kind could provide insight into a mechanism of action for the cognitive and mood improvements observed previously in children. The aim of this pilot study was to assess cognitive performance and urinary metabolite concentrations in healthy 7-10-year-old children across a 4 week daily WBB drink intervention.

methodsThis pilot study examined the effects of daily WBB consumption for 4 weeks (766 mg total polyphenols; 253 mg anthocyanins; equivalent to 240 g fresh blueberries per day) on cognition and mood in 15 healthy 7-10-year-old children. Polyphenol metabolites were measured in 24 h urine before and after the 4 week intervention.

resultsChronic WBB-related benefits were seen on cognitively demanding trials on the modified attention network task, a task measuring executive functioning. Specifically, the WBB group maintained significantly higher accuracy on incongruent trials (96%; SE 0.03) compared with placebo participants (85%; SE 0.03; p = 0.038) after the 4 week intervention, suggesting WBB was of most benefit on the more difficult aspects of the task. No significant WBB-related effects were observed on the auditory verbal learning task or the child's version of the positive and negative affect schedule. Urinary metabolite analyses indicated significant increases in different metabolites in WBB and placebo groups after 4 week consumption.

conclusionThe research demonstrates 24 h WBB bioavailability in a child cohort for the first time with increases in urinary hippuric acid excretion during 2 week daily WBB consumption. This study highlights the importance of conducting a larger study in children investigating the mechanism of action behind cognitive effects using bioavailability data.

Indexed as

Blueberry PlantsAnthocyaninsChildCognitionHumansPilot ProjectsSchoolsAnthocyaninsBlueberriesChildrenCognitionExecutive functionFlavonoidsMetabolite

Identifiers

PMID34023938
PMCPMC8572198
OpenAlexW3164096837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.