Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34023936›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2021

Serum IgG levels in children 6 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection and comparison with adults.

Silvia Bloise, Alessia Marcellino, Alessia Testa, Anna Dilillo, Saverio Mallardo, Sara Isoldi, Vanessa Martucci, Maria Teresa Sanseviero, Emanuela Del Giudice, Donatella Iorfida and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Safety of the Use of Face Masks in Pediatric Age.Environmental health insights · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Silvia BloiseDipartimento Materno Infantile, UOC di Pediatria e Neonatologia Ospedale Santa Maria Goretti, Polo Pontino, Sapienza Università di Roma, Latina, Italy. silvia.bloise1989@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2853-8318
Alessia MarcellinoDipartimento Materno Infantile, UOC di Pediatria e Neonatologia Ospedale Santa Maria Goretti, Polo Pontino, Sapienza Università di Roma, Latina, Italy.
Alessia TestaDipartimento Materno Infantile, UOC di Pediatria e Neonatologia Ospedale Santa Maria Goretti, Polo Pontino, Sapienza Università di Roma, Latina, Italy.
Anna DililloDipartimento Materno Infantile, UOC di Pediatria e Neonatologia Ospedale Santa Maria Goretti, Polo Pontino, Sapienza Università di Roma, Latina, Italy.
Saverio MallardoDipartimento Materno Infantile, UOC di Pediatria e Neonatologia Ospedale Santa Maria Goretti, Polo Pontino, Sapienza Università di Roma, Latina, Italy.
Sara IsoldiDipartimento Materno Infantile, UOC di Pediatria e Neonatologia Ospedale Santa Maria Goretti, Polo Pontino, Sapienza Università di Roma, Latina, Italy.
Vanessa MartucciDipartimento Materno Infantile, UOC di Pediatria e Neonatologia Ospedale Santa Maria Goretti, Polo Pontino, Sapienza Università di Roma, Latina, Italy.
Maria Teresa SansevieroDipartimento Materno Infantile, UOC di Pediatria e Neonatologia Ospedale Santa Maria Goretti, Polo Pontino, Sapienza Università di Roma, Latina, Italy.
Emanuela Del GiudiceDipartimento Materno Infantile, UOC di Pediatria e Neonatologia Ospedale Santa Maria Goretti, Polo Pontino, Sapienza Università di Roma, Latina, Italy.
Donatella IorfidaDipartimento Materno Infantile, UOC di Pediatria e Neonatologia Ospedale Santa Maria Goretti, Polo Pontino, Sapienza Università di Roma, Latina, Italy.
Flavia VentrigliaDipartimento Materno Infantile, UOC di Pediatria e Neonatologia Ospedale Santa Maria Goretti, Polo Pontino, Sapienza Università di Roma, Latina, Italy.
Riccardo LubranoDipartimento Materno Infantile, UOC di Pediatria e Neonatologia Ospedale Santa Maria Goretti, Polo Pontino, Sapienza Università di Roma, Latina, Italy.
Ospedale Santa Maria Goretti · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 among the population has occurred quite recently, there is a lack of evidence on the long-term duration of antibody response, especially in children. It is therefore crucial to clarify this aspect, considering its implications in the development of successful surveillance strategies, therapies, and vaccinations. The aim of this study was to assess the antibody response in a children group after SARS-CoV-2 infection, and to compare it with that of their parents affected by SARS-CoV-2 infection. We enrolled 12 children and their parents, both groups being affected by COVID-19 in April 2020. In the children's group, we collected real-time RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values and gene characterization of first nasal-throat swab at the time of diagnosis (T0); 30 days after the diagnosis (T30), we performed blood tests to detect anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG. Finally, 180 days after the diagnosis (T180), we measured anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG in both children and parents. In children, antibody levels declined significantly at 180 days (T180) after first measurement (T30). There were no significant differences in IgG level related to age, sex, and clinical manifestations. We found a significant correlation between IgG titers at T30 and Ct value of gene N. Children showed a lower level of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 at T180 compared to their parents.Conclusion: Antibody responses in children waned 180 days after SARS-CoV-2 infection, and at the same time, their parents showed a different antibody response to the virus. These results highlight that serological tests should be used with caution in surveillance strategies among the general population. What is known: • Currently is not known how long antibody response will be maintained or if it protects from reinfection. • Recent reports in adults suggest that antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 declined several months after infection, but data are missing in pediatric age. What is new: • We showed that antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 wane several months after infection also in children with quantitative differences in antibody levels between children and adults. • In this context, serological tests should be used with caution in surveillance strategies.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2AdultAntibodies, ViralChildHumansImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MAntibody responseChildrenCOVID-19Immunity

Identifiers

PMID34023936
PMCPMC8140562
OpenAlexW3164038989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.