ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2021
Development and assessment of a duplex droplet digital PCR method for quantification of GM rice Kemingdao.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Simultaneous detection of CaMV35S and NOS using fluorescence sensors with dual-emission silver nanoclusters and catalytic hairpin amplification strategy.Mikrochimica acta · 2024Article
- The Development of a Series of Genomic DNA Reference Materials with Specific Copy Number Ratios for The Detection of Genetically Modified Maize DBN9936.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- [A digital droplet PCR detection technique based on filter faster R-CNN].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2024Article
- Improved Canker Processing and Viability Droplet Digital PCR Allow Detection ofMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Comparison of Real-Time PCR and Droplet Digital PCR for the Quantitative Detection of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum subsp. plantarumFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The implementation of genetically modified organism (GMO) labeling policies requires accurate quantitative methods to measure the GMO content in test samples. A Kemingdao/phospholipase D (KMD/PLD) duplex ddPCR method was established with rice genomic DNA (gDNA) of homozygous KMD as template by optimizing the annealing temperature and cycle number. Duplex ddPCR showed a linear response over the dynamic range from 68 to 175,000 copies, covering four orders of magnitude. The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) for duplex ddPCR were determined to be 9 copies and 34 copies of the rice haploid genome, respectively. A very high dilution factor would result in unacceptable bias and coefficients of variation for determining copy number of the gDNA solution, and more than 1000 copies of the DNA template in one reaction is preferred to obtain accurate quantitative results by duplex PCR. Five blinded DNA samples with copy number ratio of 10%, 5%, 1%, 0.1%, and 0.05%, and three blinded real-life matrix samples with mass fraction of 5%, 1%, and 0.5% were quantified by duplex ddPCR, simplex ddPCR, and qPCR. These three methods all gave comparable GMO content and copy numbers within the required precision, but the duplex ddPCR showed the narrowest uncertainty interval and provided the highest precision in comparison to simplex ddPCR and qPCR. The ddPCR is a more appealing and reliable technology for the accurate quantification of GMO content than simplex ddPCR and qPCR considering the uncertainty and precision of quantitative results, the time consumption of generating droplets, and the cost of ddPCR reagents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34023912What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.