ArticleIntervirology2021
Comparison of the Amplisure HBV Quantitative Kit with the Qiagen Artus HBV QS-RGQ Assay for Quantifying Viral DNA in Plasma Samples of Monitoring Cases.
Article in Intervirology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Performance of a novel DiaRD-HCV RNA RTqPCR kit for quantification of HCV RNA in clinical samples.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025Article
- Comparison of novel DiaRD-HBV DNA qPCR kit with theTurkish journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMonitoring of hepatitis B virus (HBV) viral load has become an essential phase in the treatment of HBV. There are many commercial assays available for HBV viral load quantification. In this study, we have evaluated the performance characteristics of Amplisure® HBV Kit in comparison with the Qiagen artus HBV QS-RGQ kit for HBV DNA quantitation.
methodsComparison of 2 methods was carried out on 200 clinical samples, 150 HBV DNA positive and 50 HBV DNA negative, by a reference method. Results obtained with Amplisure® HBV Kit (Amplisure HBV) were compared using the Qiagen artus HBV QS-RGQ assay results as the comparator method.
resultThe overall performance of the Amplisure HBV compared with the comparator method shows positive and negative clinical agreement of 100 and 76%, respectively. Among the 12 qualitative discrepant samples, all positive with Amplisure HBV were sequenced and 10 were below comparator method's LOD. For 5 weak positives (-0.22 to 0.98 log IU/mL), the sequencing failed. The 7 other positives (0.48 to 1.89 log IU/mL) were confirmed positive by sequencing. Quantitative comparison gave an r2 of 0.967 with a mean log difference of 0.09 log10 IU/mL.
conclusionThis study shows that Amplisure® HBV Quantitative Kit shows comparable performance with artus HBV QS-RGQ assays and can be useful in management and therapeutic monitoring of HBV in a clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.