ArticleJACC. Cardiovascular imaging2021
A Machine-Learning Framework to Identify Distinct Phenotypes of Aortic Stenosis Severity.
Article in JACC. Cardiovascular imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of artificial intelligence in aortic valve stenosis: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Diagnostic Accuracy of AI Algorithms in Aortic Stenosis Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical medicine & research · 2024Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in echocardiography: a position statement from the British Society of Echocardiography.Echo research and practice · 2026Review
- Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Structural Heart Disease.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026Review
- Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Imaging: Where Do We Stand?Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in heart and brain ultrasound: the least you need to know.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-enhanced echocardiography in cardiovascular disease management.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026Review
- Diagnosing Severe Low-Gradient vs Moderate Aortic Stenosis with Artificial Intelligence Based on Echocardiography Images.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Comprehensive Unified Regimen for Eliminating Undiagnosed/Untreated Aortic Valve Stenosis: Algorithm Validation for Identifying Aortic Stenosis and Treatment Disparities.Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team · 2026Article
- The Emerging Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Assessment of Valvular Heart Disease with Cardiac Imaging.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- Unsupervised machine learning analysis to enhance risk stratification in patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Deep learning-assisted aortic stenosis detection and grading based on multiview versus single-view echocardiography.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Phenotyping valvular heart diseases using the lens of unsupervised machine learning: a scoping review.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2025Article
- State-of-the-art artificial intelligence methods for pre-operative planning of cardiothoracic surgery and interventions: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Review
- Aortic valve leaflet motion for diagnosis and classification of aortic stenosis using single view echocardiography.Journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Article
- Machine Learning Identification of Patient Phenoclusters in Aortic Regurgitation.JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2025Article
- Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Imaging and Interventional Cardiology: Emerging Trends and Clinical Implications.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Review
- The chronic heart failure evolutions: Different fates and routes.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
- Machine Learning to Stratify Risk in Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis Among Medicare Beneficiaries.Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
17 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe authors explored the development and validation of machine-learning models for augmenting the echocardiographic grading of aortic stenosis (AS) severity.
backgroundIn AS, symptoms and adverse events develop secondarily to valvular obstruction and left ventricular decompensation. The current echocardiographic grading of AS severity focuses on the valve and is limited by diagnostic uncertainty.
methodsUsing echocardiography (ECHO) measurements (ECHO cohort, n = 1,052), we performed patient similarity analysis to derive high-severity and low-severity phenogroups of AS. We subsequently developed a supervised machine-learning classifier and validated its performance with independent markers of disease severity obtained using computed tomography (CT) (CT cohort, n = 752) and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging (CMR cohort, n = 160). The classifier's prognostic value was further validated using clinical outcomes (aortic valve replacement [AVR] and death) observed in the ECHO and CMR cohorts.
resultsIn 1,964 patients from the 3 multi-institutional cohorts, 1,346 (68%) subjects had either nonsevere or discordant AS severity. Machine learning identified 1,117 (57%) patients as having high-severity and 847 (43%) as having low-severity AS. High-severity patients in CT and CMR cohorts had higher valve calcium scores and left ventricular mass and fibrosis, respectively than the low-severity group. In the ECHO cohort, progression to AVR and progression to death in patients who did not receive AVR was faster in the high-severity group. Compared with the conventional classification of disease severity, machine-learning-based severity classification improved discrimination (integrated discrimination improvement: 0.07; 95% confidence interval: 0.02 to 0.12) and reclassification (net reclassification improvement: 0.17; 95% confidence interval: 0.11 to 0.23) for the outcome of AVR at 5 years. For both ECHO and CMR cohorts, we observed prognostic value of the machine-learning classifications for subgroups with asymptomatic, nonsevere or discordant AS.
conclusionsMachine learning can integrate ECHO measurements to augment the classification of disease severity in most patients with AS, with major potential to optimize the timing of AVR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.