Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34023273›Full record

ArticleJACC. Cardiovascular imaging2021

A Machine-Learning Framework to Identify Distinct Phenotypes of Aortic Stenosis Severity.

Partho P Sengupta, Sirish Shrestha, Nobuyuki Kagiyama, Yasmin Hamirani, Hemant Kulkarni, Naveena Yanamala, Rong Bing, Calvin W L Chin, Tania A Pawade, David Messika-Zeitoun and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Cardiovascular imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Structural Heart Disease.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Machine Learning to Stratify Risk in Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis Among Medicare Beneficiaries.Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Partho P SenguptaWest Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA. Electronic address: partho.sengupta@wvumedicine.org.
Sirish ShresthaWest Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
Nobuyuki KagiyamaWest Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
Yasmin HamiraniWest Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
Hemant KulkarniWest Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA; M&H Research, LLC, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Naveena YanamalaWest Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
Rong BingBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Calvin W L ChinNational Heart Centre, Singapore.
Tania A PawadeBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
David Messika-ZeitounUniversity of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Lionel TastetDepartment of Medicine, Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec/Québec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Québec, Canada.
Mylène ShenDepartment of Medicine, Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec/Québec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Québec, Canada.
David E NewbyBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Marie-Annick ClavelDepartment of Medicine, Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec/Québec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Québec, Canada.
Phillippe PibarotDepartment of Medicine, Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec/Québec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Québec, Canada. Electronic address: philippe.pibarot@med.ulaval.ca.
Marc R DweckBritish Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Artificial Intelligence for Aortic Stenosis at Risk International Consortium
West Virginia University · USInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec · CABritish Heart Foundation · GBNational Heart Centre Singapore · SGUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

West Virginia IDEA-CTRU54GM104942 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI Sally Lynn Hodder · 2012 to 2026
$81.0M
British Heart Foundation CH/09/002British Heart Foundation CH/09/002/26360British Heart Foundation FS/14/78/31020British Heart Foundation FS/16/19/31982British Heart Foundation RE/18/5/34216British Heart Foundation RG/16/10/32375NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104942Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT103782AIA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe authors explored the development and validation of machine-learning models for augmenting the echocardiographic grading of aortic stenosis (AS) severity.

backgroundIn AS, symptoms and adverse events develop secondarily to valvular obstruction and left ventricular decompensation. The current echocardiographic grading of AS severity focuses on the valve and is limited by diagnostic uncertainty.

methodsUsing echocardiography (ECHO) measurements (ECHO cohort, n = 1,052), we performed patient similarity analysis to derive high-severity and low-severity phenogroups of AS. We subsequently developed a supervised machine-learning classifier and validated its performance with independent markers of disease severity obtained using computed tomography (CT) (CT cohort, n = 752) and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging (CMR cohort, n = 160). The classifier's prognostic value was further validated using clinical outcomes (aortic valve replacement [AVR] and death) observed in the ECHO and CMR cohorts.

resultsIn 1,964 patients from the 3 multi-institutional cohorts, 1,346 (68%) subjects had either nonsevere or discordant AS severity. Machine learning identified 1,117 (57%) patients as having high-severity and 847 (43%) as having low-severity AS. High-severity patients in CT and CMR cohorts had higher valve calcium scores and left ventricular mass and fibrosis, respectively than the low-severity group. In the ECHO cohort, progression to AVR and progression to death in patients who did not receive AVR was faster in the high-severity group. Compared with the conventional classification of disease severity, machine-learning-based severity classification improved discrimination (integrated discrimination improvement: 0.07; 95% confidence interval: 0.02 to 0.12) and reclassification (net reclassification improvement: 0.17; 95% confidence interval: 0.11 to 0.23) for the outcome of AVR at 5 years. For both ECHO and CMR cohorts, we observed prognostic value of the machine-learning classifications for subgroups with asymptomatic, nonsevere or discordant AS.

conclusionsMachine learning can integrate ECHO measurements to augment the classification of disease severity in most patients with AS, with major potential to optimize the timing of AVR.

Indexed as

Aortic Valve StenosisHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationAortic ValveHumansMachine LearningPhenotypePredictive Value of TestsSeverity of Illness Indexaortic stenosismachine learningtopological data analysis

Identifiers

PMID34023273
PMCPMC8434951
OpenAlexW3161997410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.