ReviewCritical care nursing clinics of North America2021
Assessment and Monitoring of Sleep in the Intensive Care Unit.
Review in Critical care nursing clinics of North America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Wearable Sleep and Circadian Monitoring in Intensive Care Nursing: A Scoping Review.Nursing in critical care · 2026Article
- Translation and Validation of the Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire for Intensive Care Unit Patients in Morocco: Reliability and Validity Assessment.Clocks & sleep · 2025Article
- Optimizing Sleep Disorder Management in Hospitalized Patients: Practical Approach for Healthcare Providers.Brain and behavior · 2025Review
- The relationship between anemia and sleep disturbances among older Chinese adults: The mediating role of handgrip strength.PloS one · 2025Article
- Quantitative Impact of Traditional Open Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery on Patients' First-Night Sleep Status in the Intensive Care Unit: Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- A Comprehensive Review of Prone Ventilation in the Intensive Care Unit: Challenges and Solutions.Cureus · 2024Review
- Exploring bispectral index as an alternative to polysomnography for long-term sleep monitoring in disorders of consciousness.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Advancements in Wearable EEG Technology for Improved Home-Based Sleep Monitoring and Assessment: A Review.Biosensors · 2023Review
- The Sunlight-Vitamin D Connection: Implications for Patient Outcomes in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit.Cureus · 2023Review
- Recent Progress in Long-Term Sleep Monitoring Technology.Biosensors · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Sleep affects physiologic and psychological recovery throughout critical illness. Patients often describe poor sleep as a major source of distress while hospitalized in an intensive care unit. The intensive care unit environment poses unique challenges for sleep assessment and monitoring. The purpose of this literature review is to discuss methods of assessment and monitoring of sleep within the intensive care unit setting. The advantages and disadvantages of physiologic monitoring of sleep (eg, polysomnography, bispectral index, and actigraphy) are compared with those of subjective measures of sleep quality (eg, validated patient-oriented sleep questionnaires, and informal nursing assessments).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.