Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34022934›Full record

Observational studyCritical care (London, England)2021

Mechanical circulatory support for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a Danish nationwide multicenter study.

Sivagowry Rasalingam Mørk, Carsten Stengaard, Louise Linde, Jacob Eifer Møller, Lisette Okkels Jensen, Henrik Schmidt, Lars Peter Riber, Jo Bønding Andreasen, Sisse Anette Thomassen, Helle Laugesen and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Critical care (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
14.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. ECPR-the evolving role in cardiac arrest.Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sivagowry Rasalingam MørkDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark. sivarasa@rm.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-4905-4590
Carsten StengaardDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Louise LindeDepartment of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Jacob Eifer MøllerDepartment of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Lisette Okkels JensenDepartment of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Henrik SchmidtDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Lars Peter RiberDepartment of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Jo Bønding AndreasenDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Sisse Anette ThomassenDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Helle LaugesenDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Phillip Michael FreemanDepartment of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Steffen ChristensenDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jacob Raben GreisenDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Mariann TangDepartment of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Peter Hasse Møller-SørensenCardiothorascic Anaesthesiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lene HolmvangDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Emilie GregersDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jesper KjaergaardDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christian HassagerDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Hans EiskjærDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Christian Juhl TerkelsenDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Aarhus University Hospital · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DKOdense University Hospital · DKAalborg University Hospital · DK

Funding

Health Research Fund of Central Denmark Region R64-A3178-B1349Hjerteforeningen 20-R142-A9498-22178Lundbeckfonden R186-2015-2132
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMechanical circulatory support (MCS) with either extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or Impella has shown potential as a salvage therapy for patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). The objective of this study was to describe the gradual implementation, survival and adherence to the national consensus with respect to use of MCS for OHCA in Denmark, and to identify factors associated with outcome.

methodsThis retrospective, observational cohort study included patients receiving MCS for OHCA at all tertiary cardiac arrest centers (n = 4) in Denmark between July 2011 and December 2020. Logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were used to determine association with outcome. Outcome was presented as survival to hospital discharge with good neurological outcome, 30-day survival and predictors of 30-day mortality.

resultsA total of 259 patients were included in the study. Thirty-day survival was 26%. Sixty-five (25%) survived to hospital discharge and a good neurological outcome (Glasgow-Pittsburgh Cerebral Performance Categories 1-2) was observed in 94% of these patients. Strict adherence to the national consensus showed a 30-day survival rate of 30% compared with 22% in patients violating one or more criteria. Adding criteria to the national consensus such as signs of life during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), pre-hospital low-flow < 100 min, pH > 6.8 and lactate < 15 mmol/L increased the survival rate to 48%, but would exclude 58% of the survivors from the current cohort. Logistic regression identified asystole (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.18-1.57), pulseless electrical activity (RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.03-1.41), initial pH < 6.8 (RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.12-1.46) and lactate levels > 15 mmol/L (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.16-1.53) as factors associated with increased risk of 30-day mortality. Patients presenting signs of life during CPR had reduced risk of 30-day mortality (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.52-0.76).

conclusionsA high survival rate with a good neurological outcome was observed in this Danish population of patients treated with MCS for OHCA. Stringent patient selection for MCS may produce higher survival rates but potentially withholds life-saving treatment in a significant proportion of survivors.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesDenmarkExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedOut-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestRetrospective StudiesStatistics, NonparametricTime FactorsCardiopulmonary resuscitationExtracorporeal membrane oxygenationImpellaMechanical circulatory supportOut-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Identifiers

PMID34022934
PMCPMC8141159
OpenAlexW3143874773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.